EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 24 / Numéro 3 (2023) Pédagogie Médicale, 24 3 (2023) 179-192 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 3, 2023
Page(s) 179 - 192
Section Concepts et Innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2023008
Published online 13 juillet 2023
  1. Tardif J. L’évaluation des compétences. Documenter le parcours de développement. Montréal : Chenelière Education, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pelaccia T. Comment (mieux) former et évaluer les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé ? Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck Supérieur, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Scallon G. L’évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétences. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge. Acad Med 2000;75:182‐90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ 2011;45:60‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernandez N, Foucault A, Dubé S, Robert D, Lafond C, Vincent A-M, et al. Learning-by-Concordance (LbC): introducing undergraduate students to the complexity and uncertainty of clinical practice. Can Med Assoc J 2016;7:e104‐e113. [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlin B, Deschênes M-F, Fernandez N. Learning-by-Concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills: AMEE Guide No. 141. Med Teach 2021;43:614‐21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Delany C, Golding C. Teaching clinical reasoning by making thinking visible: an action research project with allied health clinical educators. BMC Med Educ 2014;14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Audétat M-C, Laurin S, Sanche G. Aborder le raisonnement clinique du point de vue pédagogique. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:223‐9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dweck CS. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House Digital, Inc, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Giroux M, Saucier D, Cameron C, Rheault C. Adopting a learning stance: an essential tool for competency development. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:e48‐e51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giroux M, Girard G. Favoriser la position d’apprentissage grâce à l’interaction superviseur-supervisé. Pédagogie Médicale 2009;10:193‐210. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peyrony O, Hutin A, Truchot J, Borie R, Calvet D, Albaladejo A, et al. Impact of panelists’ experience on script concordance test scores of medical students. BMC Med Educ 2020;20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75. Med Teach 2013;35:184‐93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Charlin B, Fernandez N. Préparer et animer une formation par concordance. In : Pelaccia T (sous la direction de). Comment (mieux) former et évaluer les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé ? Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck Supérieur, 2016:325‐40. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moon JA. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: theory and practice. London: Routledge, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Paillé P, Mucchielli A. L’analyse à l’aide des catégories conceptualisantes. Paris : Armand, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cobb KA, Brown G, Hammond R, Mossop LH. Students’ perceptions of the script concordance test and its impact on their learning behavior: a mixed methods study. J Vet Med Educ 2015;42:45‐52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McAllister L, Lincoln M. Clinical education in speech language pathology. London: Whurr, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cook K, Tillard G, Wyles C, Gerhard D, Ormond T, McAuliffe M. Assessing and developing the written reflective practice skills of speech-language pathology students. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2019;21:46‐55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Caty M-È, Kinsella EA, Doyle PC. Reflective practice in speech-language pathology: a scoping review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2015;17:411‐20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tillard GD, Cook K, Gerhard D, Keast L, McAuliffe M. Speech-language pathology student participation in verbal reflective practice groups: perceptions of development, value, and group condition differences. Teach Learn Commun Sci Disord 2018;2:Art 5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Deschênes M-F, Goudreau J, Fernandez N. Learning strategies used by undergraduate nursing students in the context of a digitial educational strategy based on script concordance: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today 2020;95:104607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leclerc A-A, Nguyen LHP, Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Ayad T. Assessing the acceptability of script concordance testing: a nationwide study in otolaryngology. Can J Surg 2021;64:E317‐E323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B. Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LaDonna KA, Taylor T, Lingard L. Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Acad Med 2018;93:347‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.