Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 4, 2023
Page(s) 219 - 227
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2023019
Published online 24 janvier 2024
  1. Rakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, Hoeft T, Chewning B, Marchand L, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:390‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 2011;86:359‐64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stelfox HT, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Gustafson ML. The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med 2005;118:1126‐33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thomas MR, Dyrbye LN, Huntington JL, Lawson KL, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, et al. How do distress and well-being relate to medical student empathy? A multicenter study. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:177‐83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maury A, Buffel du Vaure C, Jaury P. Mise au point sur l’empathie clinique dans les études médicales. Médecine 2018;14:264‐7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hemmerdinger JM, Stoddart SDR, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bitoun A, Buffel du Vaure C, Lucet C, Jaury P, Malmartel A. Assessment of medical student empathy: The French validation of the JSPE-MS©. Exercer 2020;160:88‐94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neumann M, Edelhäuser F, Tauschel D, Fischer MR, Wirtz M, Woopen C, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: A systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med 2011;86:996‐1009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Spatoula V, Panagopoulou E, Montgomery A. Does empathy change during undergraduate medical education? − A meta-analysis. Med Teach 2019;41:895‐904. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med 2009;84:1182‐91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lemogne C, Buffel du Vaure C, Hoertel N, Catu-Pinault A, Limosin F, Ghasarossian C, et al. Balint groups and narrative medicine compared to a control condition in promoting students’ empathy. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:412. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Michel M. Évaluation de l’impact d’une formation à la relation thérapeutique sur l’empathie des étudiants en DFASM1 à 6 mois. Thèse pour le diplôme d’État de doctorat en médecine. Paris: Université Paris Descartes, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge referenced observation guides: An aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ 1996;30:83‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. The R Project for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation. Disponible sur : https://www.r-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  15. Buffel du Vaure C, Lemogne C, Bunge L, Catu-Pinault A, Hoertel N, Ghasarossian C, et al. Promoting empathy among medical students: A two-site randomized controlled study. J Psychosom Res 2017;103:102‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Andersen FA, Johansen ASB, Søndergaard J, Andersen CM, Assing Hvidt E. Revisiting the trajectory of medical students’ empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: A systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hasan S, Al-Sharqawi N, Dashti F, AbdulAziz M, Abdullah A, Shukkur M, et al. Level of empathy among medical students in Kuwait University, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:385‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ngo N. Comparaison de l’impact d’une formation à la relation médecin-malade chez les étudiants en médecine en fonction des facteurs sociodémographiques et culturels. Thèse pour le diplôme d’État de doctorat en médecine. Paris: Université Paris Descartes, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fauvet L, Jakoubovitch S, Mikol F. Profil et parcours des étudiants en première année commune aux études de santé. Note d’information Enseignement supérieur et recherche 15.05. Paris: Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche − Sous-direction des systèmes d’information et des études statistiques (MENESR-SIES), 2015. Disponible sur : https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/imported_files/documents/NI_PACES_-_15.05_453569.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shariat SV, Eshtad E, Ansari S. Empathy and its correlates in Iranian physicians: A preliminary psychometric study of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Med Teach 2010;32:417‐21. [Google Scholar]
  21. Baugh RF, Hoogland MA, Baugh AD. The long-term effectiveness of empathic interventions in medical education: A systematic review. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020;11:879‐90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Costa-Drolon E, Verneuil L, Manolios E, Revah-Levy A, Sibeoni J. Medical students’ perspectives on empathy: A systematic review and metasynthesis. Acad Med 2020;96:142‐54. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bearman M, Palermo C, Allen LM, Williams B. Learning empathy through simulation: A systematic literature review. Simul Healthc 2015;10:308‐19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Picard J, Catu-Pinault A, Boujut E, Botella M, Jaury P, Zenasni F. Burnout, empathy and their relationships: A qualitative study with residents in General Medicine. Psychol Health Med 2016;21:354‐61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou YC, Tan SR, Tan CGH, Ng MSP, Lim KH, Tan LHE, et al. A systematic scoping review of approaches to teaching and assessing empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.