EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 24 / Numéro 4 (2023) Pédagogie Médicale, 24 4 (2023) 229-240 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 4, 2023
Page(s) 229 - 240
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2023009
Published online 13 juillet 2023
  1. Signeyrole J. En quoi une réforme peut-elle changer les pratiques de formation ? Une question de lecture et de perspectives. Kinesither Rev 2015;15:37‐41. [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1178‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, Crevier F, Audétat MC, Charbonneau A, et al. Clinical reasoning processes: unravelling complexity through graphical representation: clinical reasoning: graphical representation. Med Educ 2012;46:454‐63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance Test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med 2000;12:189‐95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dory V, Gagnon R, Vanpee D, Charlin B. How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review: construction and implementation of script concordance tests. Med Educ 2012;46:552‐63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlin B, Deschênes MF, Dumas JP, Lecours J, Vincent A.-M. Kassis J, et al. Concevoir une formation par concordance pour développer le raisonnement professionnel : quelles étapes faut-il parcourir ? Pédagogie Médicale 2018;19:143‐9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lineberry M, Kreiter CD, Bordage G. Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores. Med Educ 2013;47:1175‐83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lineberry M, Hornos E, Pleguezuelos E, Mella J, Brailovsky C, Bordage G. Experts’ responses in script concordance tests: a response process validity investigation. Med Educ 2019;53:710‐22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Audétat MC, Laurin S, Dory V, Charlin B, Nendaz MR. Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: part I. Clinical reasoning supervision and educational diagnosis. Med Teach 2017;39:792‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brailovsky C, Charlin B, Beausoleil S, Coté S, Van der Vleuten C. Measurement of clinical reflective capacity early in training as a predictor of clinical reasoning performance at the end of residency: an experimental study on the script concordance test. Med Educ 2001;35:430‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ramaekers S, Kremer W, Pilot A, van Beukelen P, van Keulen H. Assessment of competence in clinical reasoning and decision-making under uncertainty: the script concordance test method. Assess Eval High Educ 2010;35:661‐73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumas JP, Blais JG, Charlin B. Script concordance test: can it be used to assess clinical reasoning of physiotherapy student? Physiotherapy 2015;101(Suppl. 1):e332‐e333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charlin B, Fernandez N. Préparer et animer une formation par concordance. In : Pelaccia T (sous la direction de). Comment (mieux) former et évaluer les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé ? Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck Supérieur, 2016;9319:33. [Google Scholar]
  14. Peyrony O, Hutin A, Truchot J, Borie R, Calvet D, Albaladejo A, et al. Impact of panelists’ experience on script concordance test scores of medical students. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE guide No. 75. Med Teach 2013;35:184‐93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B. Script Concordance Tests: guidelines for construction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carrière B, Caire F. Grille de contrôle de la qualité d’un test de concordance de script. Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé. Montréal : Université de Montréal [On-line]. Disponible sur : http://www.cpass.umontreal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/70/2016/03/grille_qualite_TCS.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gagnon R, Lubarsky S, Lambert C, Charlin B. Optimization of answer keys for script concordance testing: should we exclude deviant panelists, deviant responses, or neither? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16:601‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé. Obtenir les scores de vos TCS par voie informatique. Montréal : Université de Montréal [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://cpass.umontreal.ca/recherche/axes-de-recherches/concordance/tcs/corriger_tcs/. [Google Scholar]
  20. Charlin B, Brailovsky C, Leduc C, Blouin D. The Diagnosis Script Questionnaire: a new tool to assess a specific dimension of clinical competence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1998;3:51‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hornos EH, Pleguezuelos EM, Brailovsky CA, Harillo LD, Dory V, Charlin B. The Practicum Script Concordance Test: an online continuing professional development format to foster reflection on clinical practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2013;33:59‐66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bottet B, Selim J, Peillon C, Baste J-M, Schwarz L, Renaux-Petel M, et al. Évaluation objective structurée des habiletés techniques des internes de chirurgie en phase socle. Expérience monocentrique portant sur trois cohortes au Medical Training Center de Rouen. Pédagogie Médicale 2019;20:163‐75. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bobillier-Chaumon MÉ, Dubois M. L’adoption des technologies en situation professionnelle : quelles articulations possibles entre acceptabilité et acceptation ? Le Travail Humain 2009;72:355‐82. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dubois M, Bobillier-Chaumon MÉ. L’acceptabilité des technologies : bilans et nouvelles perspectives. Le Travail Humain 2009;72:305‐10. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dumas JP. L’évaluation du raisonnement clinique en physiothérapie. Thèse pour le grade de Philosophia Doctor (PhD). Montréal : Université de Montréal, 2016 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/18597?locale-attribute=fr. [Google Scholar]
  26. Elvén M, Hochwälder J, Dean E, Söderlund A. Development and initial evaluation of an instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on clients’ behavior change. Physiother Theory Pract 2018;34:367‐83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Otterman N, Maas M, Schiemanck S, van der Wees P, Kwakkel G. Development and validity of an innovative test to assess guideline-consistent clinical reasoning by physical therapists in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2019;51:418‐25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ 2018;48:1273‐96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Custers EJFM. The script concordance test: an adequate tool to assess clinical reasoning? Perspect Med Educ 2018;7:145‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Charlin B, Fernandez N. Former et évaluer par concordance : des modalités éducatives complémentaires. Pédagogie Médicale 2022;23:131‐3. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.