EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 23 / Numéro 1 (2022) Pédagogie Médicale, 23 1 (2022) 17-26 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 23, Numéro 1, 2022
Page(s) 17 - 26
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2022003
Publié en ligne 11 mai 2022
  1. Higgs J, Jones MA. Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces. In: Higgs J, Jones M, Loftus S, Christensen N (Eds.). Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd, 2008:3‐17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nendaz M, Charlin B, Leblanc V, Bordage G. Le raisonnement clinique : données issues de la recherche et implications pour l’enseignement. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:235‐54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlin B, Boshuizen H, Custers E, Feltovich P. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1178‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005;39:418‐27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairo Notari S, Sader J, Caire Fon N, Sommer J, Pereira Miozzari AC, Janjic D et al. Understanding GPs’ clinical reasoning processes involved in managing patients suffering from multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ilgen JS, Eva KW, Regehr G. What’s in a label? Is diagnosis the start or the end of clinical reasoning? J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:435‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Audétat Voirol M-C, Sader J, Cairo Notari S, Ritz C, Fon NC, Maisonneuve H, et al. Understanding and promoting clinical reasoning in chronic and multimorbid conditions: A call for GPs and healthcare professionals. Health 2019;11:1338‐1346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cook DA, Sherbino J, Durning SJ. Management reasoning: Beyond the diagnosis. JAMA 2018;319:2267‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook DA, Durning SJ, Sherbino J, Gruppen LD. Management reasoning: Implications for health professions educators and a research agenda. Acad Med 2019;94:1310‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sinnige J, Korevaar JC, van Lieshout J, Westert GP, Schellevis FG, Braspenning JC. Medication management strategy for older people with polypharmacy in general practice: A qualitative study on prescribing behaviour in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66:e540‐e551. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sinnott C, Mc Hugh S, Browne J. GPs’ perspectives on the management of patients with multimorbidity: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003610. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Excoffier S, Herzig L, N’Goran AA, Deruaz-Luyet A, Haller D. Prevalence of multimorbidity in general practice: A cross-sectional study within the Swiss sentinel surveillance system (Sentinella). BMJ Open 2018;8:e019616. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Montague T, Gogovor A, Aylen J, Ashley L, Ahmed S, Martin L et al. Patient-centred care in Canada: Key components and the path forward. Healthc Q 2017;20:50‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Excoffier S, Paschoud A, Haller D, Herzig L. Multimorbidité en médecine de famille. Rev Med Suisse 2016;12:917‐21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Luijks H, Lucassen P, van Weel C, et al. How GPs value guidelines applied to patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007905. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ritz C, Sader J, Cairo Notari S, Lanier C, Caire Fond N, Nendaz M et al. Multimorbidity & clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: A qualitative study. Fam Med Commun Health 2021;9:e000798. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1993:202‐51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 2000;75:1‐28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hillman J. Healing fiction. Putnam (CT): Spring Publications, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fauconnier G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Feldman I. From molecules to metaphors: The neural theory of language. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press (A Bradford book), 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmitt R. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. Qual Rep 2005;10:358‐94. [Google Scholar]
  26. Audétat M-C, Cairo Notari S, Sader J, Ritz C, Fassier T, Sommer JM et al. Understanding the clinical reasoning processes involved in the management of multimorbidity in an ambulatory setting: Study protocol of a stimulated recall research. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105‐12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol 2021. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196. [Google Scholar]
  29. Blumenberg H. Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer. Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher (3rd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kleist C (von). Zur Verwendung von Metaphern in den Selbstdarstellungen von Psychotherapieklienten. In: JB Bergold, U Flick (Eds.), Einsichten. Zugänge zur Sicht des Subjekts mittels qualitativer Forschung. Tübingen: DGVT, 1987:115‐24. [Google Scholar]
  31. Boyd C, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: Implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294:716‐24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rees CE, Knight LV, Wilkinson CE. Doctors being up there and we being down here: A metaphorical analysis of talk about student/doctor-patient relationships. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:725‐37. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audétat M-C, Custers E, Charlin B. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J 2015;6:e61‐e70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1998;1:2‐4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schuling J, Gebben H, Veehof LJG, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Deprescribing medication in very elderly patients with multimorbidity: The view of Dutch GPs. A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2012;13:56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Audétat M-C, Laurin S, Dory V, Charlin B, Nendaz M. Diagnostic et prise en charge des difficultés de raisonnement clinique. Guide AMEE no 117 (version courte). Première partie : supervision du raisonnement clinique et diagnostic pédagogique. Pédagogie Médicale 2017;18:129‐38. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fabri PJ. Lessons learned at sea – Ocean sailing as a metaphor for surgical training. Am J Surg 2003;186:249‐52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nevalainen M, Kuikka L, Sjoberg L, Eriksson J, Pitkala K. Tolerance of uncertainty and fears of making mistakes among fifth-year medical students. Fam Med 2012;44:240‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Witt EE, Onorato SE, Schwartzstein RM. Medical students and the drive for a single right answer: Teaching complexity and uncertainty. ATS Sch 2021. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0083PS. [Google Scholar]
  40. Moffett J, Hammond J, Murphy P, Pawlikowska T. The ubiquity of uncertainty: A scoping review on how undergraduate health professions’ students engage with uncertainty. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2021;26:913‐58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Overoye AL, Storm BC. Harnessing the power of uncertainty to enhance learning. Transl Issues Psychol Sci 2015;1:140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lodge JM, Kennedy G, Lockyer L, Arguel A, Pachman M. Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An integrative review. Front Educ 2018;3:49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wayne S, Dellmore D, Serna L, Jerabek R, Timm C, Kalishman S. The association between intolerance of ambiguity and decline in medical students’ attitudes toward the underserved. Acad Med 2011;86:877‐882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moffett J, Hammond J, Murphy P, Pawlikowska T. The ubiquity of uncertainty: A scoping review on how undergraduate health professions’ students engage with uncertainty. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2021;26:913‐58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bochatay N, Bajwa NM. Learning to manage uncertainty: Supervision, trust and autonomy in residency training. Sociol Health Illn 2020;42(Suppl. 1):145‐59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nendaz M, Charlin B, Leblanc V, Bordage G. Le raisonnement clinique : données issues de la recherche et implications pour l’enseignement. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:235‐54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: A key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med 1994;69:883‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bowen J. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2217‐25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stewart M. Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: From evidence and experience. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:793‐801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lussier M-T, Richard C. Because one shoe doesn’t fit all: A repertoire of doctor-patient relationships. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:1089‐92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Turner M. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Talmy L. Toward a cognitive linguistics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  53. Taub S. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stewart M, Belle Brown J, Wayne Weston W, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered medicine – Transforming the clinical method (2nd ed.). Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  55. Julia M-A (dir.). Nouveaux horizons sur l’espace antique et moderne (Nouvelle édition). Pessac : Ausonius Éditions, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ausonius.5238. [Google Scholar]
  56. Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:303‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Van den Akker MBF, Knottnerus JA. Comorbidity or multimorbidity: What’s in a name? A review of literature. Eur J Gen Pract 1996;2:65‐70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Dory V, Audétat M-C. Ils sont carrément incurables : comment les cliniciens enseignants perçoivent leur gestion des difficultés de raisonnement clinique de leurs internes. Pédagogie Médicale 2013;14:83‐97. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Goldstein LS. Becoming a teacher as a hero’s journey: Using metaphor in preservice teacher education. Teach Educ Q 2005;32:7‐24. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rees CE, Knight LV, Cleland JA. Medical educators’ metaphoric talk about their assessment relationships with students: “you don’t want to sort of be the one who sticks the knife in them”. Assess Eval High Educ 2009;34:455‐67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Fernandez-Duque D, Johnson M. Attention metaphors: Flow metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognit Sci 1999;23:83‐116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.