Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 20, Number 3, 2019
Page(s) 131 - 139
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2020017
Published online 13 mai 2020
  1. Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1365‐70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization, Division of Mental Health. Doctor-patient interaction and communication. World Health Organization, ‎ 1993 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/60263. [Google Scholar]
  3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Contemporary issues in medicine: communication in medicine. Report 3 of the Medical School Objectives Project. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank JRE. The CanMeds 2005 Physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better are. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med 2001;76:390‐3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Molière. Le malade imaginaire (Édition de C Joubaire). Paris: Flammarion, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Molière. Le médecin malgré lui (Édition de C Joubaire & S Gaudefroy). Paris: Flammarion, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tchekhov AP. Platonov (Trad. Markowicz A & Morvan F). Arles: Actes Sud, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. Romains J. Knock : ou le triomphe de la médecine. Paris: Gallimard, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wasylko Y, Stickley T. Theatre and pedagogy: using drama in mental health nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2003;23:443‐8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris DM. Amateur theatre and mental health services − a fruitful collaboration to enhance clinical supervision. Aust Nurs Midwifery 2015;22:40‐3. [Google Scholar]
  12. Himida T, Nanjappa S, Yuan S, Freeman R. Dental students’ perceptions of learning communication skills in a forum theatre-style teaching session on breaking bad news. Eur J Dent Educ 2019;23:95‐100. [Google Scholar]
  13. Neilson SJ, Reeves A. The use of a theatre workshop in developing effective communication in paediatric end of life care. Nurse Educ Pract 2019;36:7‐12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Skye EP, Wagenschutz H, Steiger JA, Kumagai AK. Use of interactive theater and role play to develop medical students’ skills in breaking bad news. J Cancer Educ 2014;29:704‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stanislavskij KS. La formation de l’acteur. Paris: Payot & Rivages, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lecoq J. Le corps poétique : un enseignement de la création théâtrale. Arles: Actes Sud, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boal A. Théâtre de l’opprimé. Paris: La Découverte, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haute Autorité de santé. Simulation en santé. 2019 [On-line]. Disponibles sur : https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_930641/fr/simulation-en-sante. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiniara G, Cole G, Brisbin K, Huffman D, Cragg B, Lamacchia M, et al. Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection. Med Teach 2013;35:e1380‐95. [Google Scholar]
  20. Girard G, Clavet D, Boulé R. Planifier et animer un jeu de rôle profitable pour l’apprentissage. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:178‐85. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as ‘nonjudgmental’ debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1:49‐55. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc 2016;11:209‐17. [Google Scholar]
  23. Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tavares W, et al. Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 2014;61:571‐82. [Google Scholar]
  24. Anderson HA, Young J, Marrelli D, Black R, Lambreghts K, Twa MD. Training students with patient actors improves communication: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2014;91:121‐8. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Nofziger AC, Meldrum SC, Epstein RM. Further challenges in measuring communication skills: accounting for actor effects in standardised patient assessments. Med Educ 2008;42:662‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tait L, Lee K, Rasiah R, Cooper JM, Ling T, Geelan B, Bindoff I. Simulation and feedback in health education: a mixed methods study comparing three simulation modalities. Pharmacy (Basel) 2018;6:41. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bonnaud-Antignac A, Grenier M-H., Mouzard A, Amar M. Enseignement de la relation médecin-patient en pédiatrie à des étudiants de médecine à partir de la méthode du théâtre-forum. Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc 2009;57:510‐6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mabakutuvangilanga-Ntela S-D, Ishoso Katwashi D, Ahouah M, Tshimungu Kandolo F, Rothan Tondeur M, Margat A. Le théâtre, une méthode pédagogique au profil du changement de comportement dans les soins : revue systématique de la littérature. Educ Therap Patient 2019;11:20201. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pilnick A, Trusson D, Beeke S, O’Brien R, Goldberg S, Harwood RH. Using conversation analysis to inform role play and simulated interaction in communications skills training for healthcare professionals: identifying avenues for further development through a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995;152:1423‐33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Alroy G, Ber R, Kramer D. An evaluation of the short-term effects of an interpersonal skills course. Med Educ 1984;18:85‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Feletti G, Firman D, Sanson-Fisher R. Patient satisfaction with primary-care consultations. J Behav Med 1986;9:389‐99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Guigot M, Menard J-F., Weber J, Colin R. Mesure de l’impact d’un enseignement spécifique sur l’aptitude à la communication orale d’étudiants en médecine de deuxième année. Pédagogie Médicale 2002;3:8‐13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guigot M, Menard J-F., Lechevallier J, Weber J. Confirmation de l’impact d’un enseignement spécifique sur l’aptitude à communiquer d’étudiants en médecine de deuxième et troisième années. Pédagogie Médicale 2004;5:200‐3. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Aspegren K. BEME guide No. 2: teaching and learning communication skills in medicine-a review with quality grading of articles. Med Teach 1999;21:563‐70. [Google Scholar]
  36. Maguire GP, Clarke D, Jolley B. An experimental comparison of three courses in history-taking skills for medical students. Med Educ 1977;11:175‐82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rees C, Sheard C, McPherson A. Medical students’ views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills. Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:119‐21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hamdi S, Bressan Y. Du théâtre à l’amphithéâtre : pour une extension du concept d’adhésion à la neuroscience éducationnelle. Neuroéducation 2013;2:1‐86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaufman DM, Laidlaw TA, Macleod H. Communication skills in medical school: exposure, confidence, and performance. Acad Med 2000;75:S90‐92. [Google Scholar]
  40. Barrows HS. Simulated patients in medical teaching. CMAJ 1968;98:674‐6. [Google Scholar]
  41. van Dalen J, Zuidweg J, Collet J. The curriculum of communication skills teaching at Maastricht Medical School. Med Educ 1989;23:55‐61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Craig JL. Retention of interviewing skills learned by first-year medical students: a longitudinal study. Med Educ 1992;26:276‐81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Benson J, Draper J. Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides. Acad Med 2003;78:802‐9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.