Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 18, Numéro 3, Août 2017
Page(s) 129 - 138
Section Références
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2018012
Publié en ligne 19 octobre 2018
  1. Schön D. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rudaz A, Gut AM, Louis-Simonet M, Perrier A, Vu NV, Nendaz MR. Acquisition of clinical competence: added value of clerkship real-life contextual experience. Med Teach 2013;35:e957‐62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoffman K, Donaldson J. Contextual tensions of the clinical environnement and their influence on teaching and learning. Med Educ 2004;38:448‐54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Prideaux D, Alexander H, Bower A, Dacre J, Haist S, Jolly B, et al. Clinical teaching: maintaining an educational role for doctors in the new health care environment. Med Educ 2000;34:820‐26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irby DM. Excellence in clinical teaching: knowledge transformation and development required. Med Educ 2014;48:776‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Steinert Y. The “problem” learner: whose problem is it? AMEE Guide No. 76. Med Teach 2013;35:e1035‐e45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hauer K, Ciccone A, Henzel T, Katsufrakis P, Miller S, Norcross W, et al. Remediation of the deficiencies of physicians across the continuum from medical school to practice: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 2009;84:1822‐32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cleland J, Leggett H, Sandars J, Costa MJ, Patel R, Moffat M. The remediation challenge: theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review. Med Educ 2013;47:242‐51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frellsen SLMD, Baker EAMDM, Papp KKP, Durning SJMD. Medical school policies regarding struggling medical students during the internal medicine clerkships: results of a National survey. Acad Med 2008;83:876‐81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hicks PJ, Cox SM, Espey EL, Goepfert AR, Bienstock JL, Erickson SS, et al. To the point: medical education reviews − dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1915‐22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Audétat MC, Laurin S, Sanche G. Aborder le raisonnement clinique du point de vue pédagogique. I. Un cadre conceptuel pour identifier les problèmes de raisonnement clinique chez les étudiants. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:223‐9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Audétat MC. L’identification et la remédiation des difficultés de raisonnement clinique en médecine (État des pratiques, recherche d’outils et processus pour soutenir les cliniciens enseignants) [Thèse pour le doctorat d’université]. Montréal : Université de Montréal, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Laidley TL, Braddock CH, Fihn SD. Did I answer your question?: Attending physicians’ recognition of residents’ perceived learning needs in ambulatory settings. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:46‐50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Audétat MC, Faguy A, Jacques A, Blais J, Charlin B. Étude exploratoire des perceptions et pratiques de médecins cliniciens enseignants engagés dans une démarche de diagnostic et de remédiation des lacunes du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:7‐16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Higgs J, Jones M. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3e ed, in Higgs J, Jones M, Editors. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heineman Ltd., PL 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ark TK, Brooks LR, Eva KW. Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Acad Med 2006;81:405‐9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Norman G, Monteiro S, Sherbino J. Is clinical cognition binary or continuous? Acad Med 2013;88:1058‐60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Norman G, Sherbino J, Dore K, Wood T, Young M, Gaissmaier W, et al. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med 2014;89:277‐84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chang RW, Bordage G, Connell KJ. The importance of early problem representation during case presentations. Acad Med 1998;73(10 Suppl.):S109‐11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ericsson K. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nendaz MR, Bordage G. Promoting diagnostic problem representation. Med Educ 2002;36:760‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med 1994;69:883‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nendaz M, Charlin B, Leblanc V, Bordage G. Le raisonnement clinique : données issues de la recherche et implications pour l’enseignement. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:235‐54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 2000;75:182-90. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. Effective educational and clinical supervision: AMEE Guide No. 27. Med Teach 2007;29:2‐19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt H, Rikers R. How expertise develops in medecine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007;41:1133‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning; past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005;39:418‐27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Eva K. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2004;39:98‐106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chamberland M, St-Onge C, Setrakian J, Lanthier L, Bergeron L, Bourget A, et al. The influence of medical students’ self-explanations on diagnostic performance. Med Educ 2011;45:688‐95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implications. Acad Med 1990;65:611‐21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nendaz MR, Gut AM, Louis-Simonet M, Perrier A, Vu NV. Bringing explicit insight into cognitive psychology features during clinical reasoning seminars: a prospective, controlled study. Educ Health (Abingdon, England) 2011;24:496. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stalmeijer R, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen I, Scherpbier A. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:535‐46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vaughn L, Baker R, T DW. The problem learner. Teach Learn Med 1998;10:217‐22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Evans D, Alstead E, Brown J. Applying your clinical skills to students and trainees in academic difficulty. Clin Teach 2010;7:230‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Irby DM. How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching rounds. Acad Med 1992;67:630‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Côté L, Bordage G. Content and conceptual frameworks of preceptor feedback related to residents’ educational needs. Acad Med 2012;87:1274‐81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kilminster S, Jolly B. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ 2000;34:827‐40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wolpaw T, Papp K, Bordage G. Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning und uncertainties: a randomized comparison group trial. Acad Med 2009;84:517‐24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Med 1992;5:419‐24. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ferenchick G, Simpson D, Blackman J, DaRosa D, Dunnington G. Strategies for efficient and effective teaching in the ambulatory care setting. Acad Med 1997;72:277‐80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mehlman C. Regular and special features: teaching orthopaedics on the run: tell me the story backward, in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, Farmer J, Editor. 413 Cincinnati: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., 2003, p. 303-308. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cunningham A, Blatt S, Fuller P, Weinberger H. The art of precepting: Socrates or Aunt Minnie? Arch Pediatr Adoles Med 1999;153:114‐6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuhn G. Diagnostic errors. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9(7):740‐50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Boshuizen H, Schmidt H. On the rôle of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cogn Sci 1992;16:153‐84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hunt DD, Carline J, Tonesk X, Yergan J, Siever M, Loebel JP. Types of problem students encountered by clinical teachers on clerkships. Med Educ 1989;23:14‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yates J, James D. Predicting the “strugglers”: a case-control study of students at Nottingham University Medical School. BMJ 2006;332:1009‐13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Audétat MC, Lubarsky S, Blais JG, Charlin B. Clinical reasoning: where do we stand on identifying and remediating difficulties? Creative Educ 2013;4(6A):42‐8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Audétat MC, Voirol C, Beland N, Fernandez N, Sanche G. Remediation plans in family medicine residency. Can Fam Phys 2015;61:e425‐34. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hauer KE, O’Brien B, Poncelet AN. Longitudinal, integrated clerkship education: better for learners and patients. Acad Med 2009;84:821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Audetat MC, Dory V, Nendaz M, Vanpee D, Pestiaux D, Junod Perron N, et al. What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties ? Med Educ 2012;46:216‐27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:106‐13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Bordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med 1999;74:S138‐S43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Norman G, Monteiro S, Sherbino J, Ilgen J, Schmidt H, Mamede S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med 2017;92:23‐30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1493‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nendaz M, Perrier A. Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice. Swiss Med Wkly 2012;142:w13706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Durning S, Artino AR, Jr., Pangaro L, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L. Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice. Med Educ 2011;45:927-38. [Google Scholar]
  61. Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth, Heinemann, Elsevier, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  62. Audetat MC, Laurin S, Sanche G. Aborder le raisonnement clinique du point de vue pédagogique. II. Les difficultés de raisonnement clinique à l’étape du recueil initial des données et de la génération d’hypothèses. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:231‐6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  63. Norman G, Eva K. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2010;44:94‐100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kassirer J, Wong J, Kopelman R. Learning clinical reasoning. Baltimore: William & Wilkins, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rencic J. Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2011;33:887‐92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Audétat M, Laurin S, Sanche G, Béïque C, Caire-Fon N, Blais J, et al. Clinical reasoning difficulties: a taxonomy for clinical teachers. Med Teach 2013;35:e984‐e9. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kassirer J. Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. Am J Med 1989;86:443‐1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Chimowitz M, Logigian E, Caplan L. The accuracy of bedside neurological diagnoses. Ann Neurol 1990;28:78‐85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kempainen R, Migeon M, Wolf F. Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2003;25:177‐81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Irby D. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:898‐931. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Irby D, Wilkerson L. Teaching when time is limited. BMJ 2008;336:384‐7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.