EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 24 / Numéro 2 (2023) Pédagogie Médicale, 24 2 (2023) 115-127 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 2, 2023
Page(s) 115 - 127
Section Concepts et Innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2023003
Published online 26 juin 2023
  1. Bonvin R, Lamy O. Enseignement des compétences cliniques en médecine ou le juste retour du clinicien. Rev Med Suisse 2009;4:2158‐62. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) standards of best practice (SOBP). Adv Simul (Lond) 2017;2:10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aiello MT, Struijk JS, Szauter K, Nicholas CF. Professional development of the SP educator. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:203‐19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nicholas CF, Cohen-Tigor D, LaMarra DE, Smith CM, Gliva-McConvey G, Chapin A. Standardized/simulated patient program management and administration – spinning plates. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:169‐201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schlegel C, Woermann U, Rethans JJ, van der Vleuten C. Validity evidence and reliability of a simulated patient feedback instrument. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collectif. ECOS – Examen clinique objectif structuré. Lausanne : Université de Lausanne/Faculté de biologie et de médecine/École de médecine, 2019 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://www.unil.ch/ecoledemedecine/fr/home/menuinst/examens-evaluations/ecos.html. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC Acad Med 1993;68:443‐51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nestel D, Bearman M. Simulated patient methodology: theory, evidence, and practice. Chichester (UK): Wiley Blackwell, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gliva-McConvey G, Shannon GM, Pitt J, Clark L. The human simulation continuum: integration and application. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:31‐50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Churchouse C, McCafferty C. Standardized patients versus simulated patients: is there a difference? Clin Simul Nurs 2012;8:363‐5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Burnier I, Bouchard-Lamothe D, Khouani Z. Patient simulé et patient standardisé : peut-on en finir avec le terme SPs ? Pédagogie Médicale 2019;20:147‐9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lopreiato JO, Downing D, Gammon W, Lioce L (eds). Healthcare simulation dictionary. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Publ, 2016:16(17)-0043. [Google Scholar]
  13. Weaks C, Hopkins H, Lyman L, George SW. Broader applications of communication: using the human body for teaching and assessment. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:221‐40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Viret F, Vadot S, Morend L, Christen A, Bonvin R. Working with actors and non-actors as simulated patients: an advantage? MedEdPublish 2016;5:61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wallace P. Coaching standardized patients: for use in the assessment of clinical competence. New York: Springer, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1:49‐55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Viret F. Highly emotionally loaded breaking bad news (BBN) scenarios: how to promote a simulated patients (SP) team’s motivation. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA);14-17.09.2016; Bern. In: Meeting Abstracts, 2016 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://doi.org/10.3205/16gma045. [Google Scholar]
  18. Furman GE, Miller JL. Development of scenario and training materials: Fundamentals, interprofessional and hybrid scenarios, and inclusion of patients in standardized patient methodology. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:51‐72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith CM, Gliva-McConvey G, Chapin A. Training SPs for authentic role portrayal. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:73‐104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gliva-McConvey G, Furman GE. How to train SPs in 10 steps. In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:105‐16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanson MD, Niec A, Pietrantonio AM, Johnson S, Young M, High B, et al. Effects associated with adolescent standardized patient simulation of depression and suicidal ideation. Acad Med 2007;82:61‐4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Naftulin DH, Andrew BJ. The effects of patient simulations on actors. J Med Educ 1975;50:87‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hodges B. Effects of portraying psychologically and emotionally complex standardized patient roles. Teach Learn Med 1999;11:135‐41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Woodward CA, Gliva-McConvey G. The effect of simulating on standardized patients. Acad Med 1995;70:418‐20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Triviño X, Ferrer L, Bernales M, Cianelli R, Moore P, Peragallo N. Effect of emotionally complex roles on HIV-related simulated patients. Hisp Health Care Int 2013;11:72‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Félix S. Teaching and feedback: an important role for simulated patients. Clin Teach 2022;19:184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bank I, Rasenberg EMC, Makkenze-Mangold SH, Nelissen S, van Wijngaarden J, Lovink AG, et al. Fifteen simulated patient working formats to use in communication skills training: report of a survey. Med Teach 2021;43:1391‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cantillon P, Stewart B, Haeck K, Bills J, Ker J, Rethans JJ. Simulated patient programmes in Europe: collegiality or separate development? Med Teach 2010;32:106‐10. [Google Scholar]
  29. Elcin M. The standardized/simulated patient methodology around the World (Part I). In: Gliva-McConvey G, Nicholas CF, Clark L (eds). Comprehensive healthcare simulation: implementing best practices in standardized patient methodology. Cham: Springer, 2020:263‐82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.