EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 22 / Numéro 4 (2021) Pédagogie Médicale, 22 4 (2021) 167-176 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 22, Number 4, 2021
Page(s) 167 - 176
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2021022
Published online 1 décembre 2021
  1. Goudreau J, Boyer L, Létourneau D. Clinical nursing reasoning in nursing practice: A cognitive learning model based on a think aloud methodology. Qual Adv Nurs Educ 2014;1. https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pitt V, Powis D, Levett-Jones T, Hunter S. The influence of critical thinking skills on performance and progression in a pre-registration nursing program. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:125‐31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benner P, Sutphen M, Leonard V, Day L. Educating nurses: A call for transformation. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunter S, Arthur C. Clinical reasoning of nursing students on clinical placement: Clinical educators’ perceptions. Nurse Educ Pract 2016;18:73‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herron E, Sudia T, Kimble L, Davis A. Prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students’ perceptions of their development of clinical reasoning. J Nurs Educ 2016;55:329‐35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: A learner-centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med 2003;78:893‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapados C, Audétat M-C, Laurin S. Le raisonnement clinique de l’infirmière. Perspectives infirmières 2014;11:37‐40. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Routledge, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wolpaw T, Côté L, Papp KK, Bordage G. Student uncertainties drive teaching during case presentations: More so with SNAPPS. Acad Med 2012;87:1210‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolpaw T, Papp KK, Bordage G. Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: A randomized comparison group trial. Acad Med 2009;84:517‐24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wolpaw T, Wolpan D, Papp K. SNAPPS: A six-step learner centered approach to clinical education. Acad Med 2013;78:893‐98. [Google Scholar]
  12. Barangard H, Afshari P, Abedi P. The effect of the SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select) method versus teacher-centered education on the clinical gynecology skills of midwifery students in Iran. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2016;13:41‐41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seki M, Otaki J, Breugelmans R, Komoda T, Nagata-Kobayashi S, Akaishi Y, et al. How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes? − SNAPPS and the one-minute preceptor. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pascoe JM, Nixon J, Lang VJ. Maximizing teaching on the wards: Review and application of the One-Minute Preceptor and SNAPPS models. J Hosp Med 2015;10:125‐30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cayley WE Jr. Effective clinical education: Strategies for teaching medical students and residents in the office. WMJ 2011;110:178‐81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sawanyawisuth K, Schwartz A, Wolpaw T, Bordage G. Expressing clinical reasoning and uncertainties during a Thai internal medicine ambulatory care rotation: Does the SNAPPS technique generalize? Med Teach 2015;37:379‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weitzel KW, Walters EA, Taylor J. Teaching clinical problem solving: A preceptor’s guide. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2012;69:1588‐99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heinerichs S, Vela LI, Drouin JM. A learner-centered technique and clinical reasoning, reflection, and case presentation attributes in athletic training students. J Athl Train 2013;48:362‐71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierce C, Corral J, Aagaard E, Harnke B, Irby DM, Stickrath C. A BEME realist synthesis review of the effectiveness of teaching strategies used in the clinical setting on the development of clinical skills among health professionals: BEME Guide No. 61. Med Teach 2020;42:604‐15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Kalraiya A, Longia S. Use of SNAPPS model for pediatric outpatient education. Indian Pediatr 2017;54:288‐290. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Pearson, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Loiselle CG, Profetto-McGrath J, Polit DF, Beck CT. Méthodes de recherche en sciences infirmières : approches quantitatives et qualitatives. Montréal : ERPI, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huberman AM, Miles BM. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994:428‐44. [Google Scholar]
  24. Seki M, Otaki J, Breugelmans R, Komoda T, Nagata-Kobayashi S, Akaishi Y, et al. How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes? – SNAPPS and the one-minute preceptor. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Magalhães AMM, Costa DGD, Riboldi CO, Mergen T, Barbosa ADS, Moura G. Association between workload of the nursing staff and patient safety outcomes. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2017;51:e03255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.