EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 3 (Août 2018) Pédagogie Médicale, 19 3 (2018) 113-122 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 19, Number 3, Août 2018
Page(s) 113 - 122
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2019021
Published online 8 novembre 2019
  1. Weston KM, Mullan JR, McLennan L. Building research capacity through community-based project. Med Educ 2010;44:496‐7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hojgaard L, Hynes M. Medical research education in Europe. Eur Sci Found 2012. Disponible sur http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/spb46_MedResEurope.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Federation for Medical Education (WFME). Global standards for quality improvement in medical education. 2007. Disponible sur www.wfme.org. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cumming A, Ross M. The Tuning Project for Medicine-learning outcomes for undergraduate medical medical education in Europe. Med Educ 2007;29:636‐41. [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank JR, Snell LS, Sherbino J, Boucher A. Référentiel de compétences CanMEDS 2015 pour les médecins. Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada. 2015. Disponible sur http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/canmeds-framework-f. [Google Scholar]
  6. Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, Cumming AD, Evans PA, Friedman Ben David M, et al. The Scottish doctor – Learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: A foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Med Teach 2002;24:136‐43. [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Schravendijk C, Marz R, Garcia-Seoane J. Exploring the integration of the biomedical research component in undergraduate education. Med Teach 2013;35:e1243‐51. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramsauer VP. An elective course to engage pharmacy students in research activities. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75:1‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devi V, Abraham RR, Kamath U. Teaching and assessing reflecting skills among undergraduate medical students experiencing research. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:1‐5. [Google Scholar]
  10. Morison S, Jenkins J. Sustained effects of interprofessional shared learning on student attitudes to communication and team working depend on shared learning opportunities on clinical placement as well as in the classroom. Med Teach 2007;29:450‐6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hudson JN, Tonkin AL. Clinical Skills Education: Outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients. Med Educ 2008;42:901‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In: Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.), Stufflebeam DL, Madaus GF, Kellaghan T, Editors. Kluwer Academic: Boston(MA), 2000, pp. 280‐317. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine R, O’Boyle M, Haidet P, Lynn D, Stone M, Wolf D, Stone MM, Paniagua F. Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning. Teach Learn Med 2004;16:270‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas P, Bowen C. A controlled trial of team-based learning in an ambulatory medicine clerkship for medical students. Teach Learn Med 2011;23:31‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.