EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 20 / Numéro 4 (2019) Pédagogie Médicale, 20 4 (2019) 177-185 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 20, Number 4, 2019
Page(s) 177 - 185
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2020021
Published online 12 juin 2020
  1. Burnier I, Bouchard-Lamothe D, Khounai Z. Patient simulé et patient standardisé : peut-on en finir avec le terme SPs ? Pédagogie Médicale 2019;20:147‐9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bokken JJAL, Rethans PMJ-J, Scherpbier PMA, Van Der Vleuten PMC. Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: a review. Simul Healthc 2008;3:161‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland JA, Abe K, Rethans JJ. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42. Med Teach 2009;31:477‐86. [Google Scholar]
  4. Spencer J, Blackmore D, Heard S, McCrorie P, McHaffie D, Scherpbier A, et al. Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students. Med Educ 2000;34:851‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sanko SJ, Shekhter RI, Kyle JR, Di Benedetto JS, Birnbach JD. Establishing a Convention for acting in healthcare simulation: merging art and science. Simul Healthc 2013;8:215‐20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dieckmann P, Manser T, Wehner T, Rall M. Reality and fiction cues in medical patient simulation: an interview study with anesthesiologists. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 2007;1:148‐68. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shankar PR, Dwivedi NR. Standardized patient’s views about their role in the teaching-learning process of undergraduate basic science medical students. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:JC01. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gough S, Green L, Nestel D, Hellaby M, MacKinnon R, Natali A, Roberts S, Tuttle N, Webster B. Simulated patients: a standardised, quality assured approach to training and implementation. Manchester: Health Education North West, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Perera J, Abdullah J, Lee N. Training simulated patients: evaluation of a training approach using self-assessment and peer/tutor feedback to improve performance. BMC Med Educ 2009;9:37. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. May W. Training standardized patients for a high-stakes clinical performance examination in the California Consortium for the assessment of clinical competence. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:640‐5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith CM, Gephardt EG, Nestel D. Applying the theory of Stanislavski to simulation: stepping into role. Clin Simul Nurs 2015;11:361‐7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Plaksin J, Nicholson J, Kundrod S, Zabar S, Kalet A, Altshuler L. The benefits and risks of being a standardized patient: a narrative review of the literature. Patient 2016;9:15‐25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boet S, Granry JC, Savoldelli G. La simulation en santé : de la théorie à la pratique. Paris : Springer, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Reeves N, Waite M, Tuttle N, Bialocerkowski A. Simulated patient contributions to enhancing exercise physiology student clinical assessment skills. Adv Simul 2019;4:15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nestel DF, Bearman ML. Simulated patient methodology: theory, evidence and practice. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bokken L, Van Dalen J, Rethans JJ. Performance‐related stress symptoms in simulated patients. Med Educ 2004;38:1089‐94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bandura A. Auto-efficacité : le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. Bruxelles : De Boeck, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. Galand B, Vanlede M. Abstract. Savoirs 2004;Hors série:91‐116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pelaccia T. Comment [mieux] former et évaluer les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé ? Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck supérieur, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karsenti T, Savoie Zajc L. La recherche en éducation : étapes et approches. Saint-Laurent (QC): ERPI, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77‐101. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dory V, Foy T, Degryse J. Pédagogie Médicale 2019;10:41‐53. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pelaccia T. Comment mieux superviser les étudiants en sciences de la santé dans leurs stages et dans leurs activités de recherche ? Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck supérieur, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.