EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 4 (Novembre 2018) Pédagogie Médicale, 19 4 (2018) 161-169 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 19, Number 4, Novembre 2018
Page(s) 161 - 169
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2019024
Published online 17 octobre 2019
  1. Boet SE, Granry JCE, Savoldelli GE. La simulation en santé : de la théorie à la pratique. Paris : Springer, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hudson J, Ratnapalan S. Enseigner les habiletés cliniques avec l’aide des patients. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:372‐5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rees C, Sheard C, Mac Pherson A. Medical students’ views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills. Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:119‐21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burns CL. Using debriefing and feedback in simulation to improve participant performance: An educator’s perspective. Int J Med Educ 2015;6:118‐20. [Google Scholar]
  5. May W, Park JH, Lee JP. A ten-year review of the literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning: 1996–2005. Med Teach 2009;31:487‐92. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrows SH. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Acad Med 1993;31:443‐51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cleland JA, Abe K, Rethans J-J. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42(1). Med Teach 2009;31:477‐86. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson TR, Duerson TM, Rathe TR, Pauly TR. Using standardized patients as teachers: A concurrent controlled trial. Acad Med 2001;76:840‐3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Allen SS, Miller J, Ratner E. Santilli J. The educational and financial impact of using patient educators to teach introductory physical exam skills. Med Teach 2011;33:911‐8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mclaughlin K, Gregor L, Jones A, Coderre S. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners? BMC Med Educ 2006;6:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karsenti T, Savoie-Zajc L. La recherche en éducation : étapes et approches. Saint-Laurent (QC) : ERPI, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Merriam SB. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (1st ed.). San Francisco(CA): Jossey-Bass, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence. Philadelphia (PA): Mosby / Elsevier, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilkinson TJ, Fontaine S. Patients’ global ratings of student competence. Unreliable contamination or gold standard? Med Educ 2002;36:1117‐21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whelan GP, Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Norcini JJ, Van Zanten M, Hambleton RK et al. Scoring standardized patient examinations: lessons learned from the development and administration of the ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA®). Med Teach 2005;27:200‐6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Barbeau D, Montini A, Roy C. Tracer les chemins de la connaissance : la motivation scolaire [livre du maître]. Montréal (QC) : Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bandura A. L’apprentissage social (Trad. A Rondal). Bruxelles : P. Mardaga, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  18. Halman S, Dudek N, Wood T, Pugh D, Touchie C, McAleer S et al. Direct observation of clinical skills feedback scale: Development and validity evidence. Teach Learn Med 2016;28:385‐94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.