EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 14 / Numéro 1 (février 2013) Pédagogie Médicale, 14 1 (2013) 5-7 References
Free Access
Editorial
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 14, Number 1, février 2013
Page(s) 5 - 7
Section Éditorial
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2013033
Published online 9 avril 2013
  1. Pelaccia T, Dory V, Denef J-F. La recherche en éducation médicale : état des lieux, perspectives et rôle de la Société internationale francophone d'éducation médicale (SIFEM). Pédagogie Médicale 2011; 12:139-48. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Denef J-F, Maillard D. Le Congrès AMEE–SIFEM d’août 2012 à Lyon, un moment important dans la vie de notre société. Pédagogie Médicale 2012; 13:221-223. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Trigwell K, Shale S. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud High Educ 2004;29:523-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. Br Med J 2007;335:333-5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Eva KW. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ 2009; 43:294-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Norman G. How Bad Is Medical Education Research Anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ 2007;12:1-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. La recherche en éducation médicale : entre le service et la science. Pédagogie Médicale 2006;7:73-81. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pelaccia T, Paillé P. La recherche qualitative en pédagogie médicale : histoire, pratique et légitimité. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:179-92. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:2520-2531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gruppen L. Is medical education research “hard” or “soft” research? Adv Health Sci Educ 2008;13:1-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:128-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 2003;37:582-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010;44:31-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 2009;43:196-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpier A. « La boussole de la recherche » : un introduction à la recherche en éducation médicale. Guide AMEE n°56. Pédagogie Médicale 2013;14:49-72. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Method Res 2007;1:48-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jouquan J. La publication des versions françaises d’une sélection de guides de l’Association for medical education in Europe: un nouveau partenariat entre la SIFEM et l’AMEE. Pédagogie Médicale 2012;13:77-8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.