EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 24 / Numéro 4 (2023) Pédagogie Médicale, 24 4 (2023) 253-261 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 4, 2023
Page(s) 253 - 261
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2023021
Published online 24 janvier 2024
  1. Cain C, Miller J (eds.). Scope and standards for progressive and critical care nursing practice. Aliso Viejo (CA): American Association of Critical Care Nurses 2019. Disponible sur : https://www.aacn.org/nursing-excellence/standards/aacn-scope-and-standards-for-progressive-and-critical-care-nursing-practice. [Google Scholar]
  2. Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses. Standards for critical care nursing practice. London (ON): Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, 2017. Disponible sur : https://caccn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/STCACCN-2017-Standards-5th-Ed.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tanner CA. Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ 2006;45:204‐11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lavoie P, Deschênes M-F., Richard V, Pepin J, Tanner CA, Lasater K. Traduction et adaptation d’un modèle du jugement clinique infirmier pour la recherche et la formation infirmière en contexte francophone. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education − Avancées en formation infirmière 2021;7:Art. 4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Slavin RE. Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales De Psicología 2014;30:785‐91. [Google Scholar]
  6. Slavin RE. L’apprentissage coopératif : pourquoi ça marche ? In: Dumont H, Istance D, Benavides F (sous la direction de). Comment apprend-on la recherche au service de la pratique. Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement. Paris: Éditions OCDE, 2010:171‐89. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillies R. Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2016;41:39‐54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goudreau J, Pepin J, Larue C, Dubois S, Descoteaux R, Lavoie P et al. A competency-based approach to nurses’ continuing education for clinical reasoning and leadership through reflective practice in a care situation. Nurse Educ Pract 2015;15:572‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bilodeau I, Pepin J, St-Louis L. Journal club in a critical care unit: An innovative desing triggering learning through reading and dialogue. Dynamics 2012;23:18‐23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R. The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review. ISRN Nurs 2013:930901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelwati, Abdullah KL, Chan CM. A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring peer learning experiences of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2018;71:185‐92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larue C, Dubois S, Girard F, Goudreau J, Dumont K. Le développement continu des compétences de raisonnement clinique et de leadership : facteurs personnels et facteurs organisationnels. Recherches en Soins Infirmiers 2013;1:76‐87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson C, Stapley S. Do educational interventions improve nurses’ clinical decision making and judgement? A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2011;48:881‐93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Benner PE. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Upper Saddler River (NJ): Prentice Hall, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zuriguel Perez E, Lluch Canut MT, Falco Pegueroles A, Puig Llobet M, Moreno Arroyo C, Roldan Merino J. Critical thinking in nursing: Scoping review of the literature. Int J Nurs Pract 2015;21:820‐30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Benner P. Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bulletin of Science, Technology et Society 2004;24:188‐99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2017;4:2333393617742282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Res Nurs Health 2017;40:23‐42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hermanowicz JC. The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed. Qualitative Sociology 2002;25:479‐99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research (4th éd.). Los Angeles (CA): Sage, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 2006;3:77‐101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turner S, Harder N. Psychological safe environment: A concept analysis. Clin Simul Nurs 2018;18:47‐55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. INACSL Standards Committee, Bowler F, Klein M, Wilford A. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM professional integrity. Clin Simul Nurs 2021;58:45‐8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guraya SY, Barr H. The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018;34:160‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD002213. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hassani P, Abdi A, Jalali R. State of science, “Intuition in nursing practice”: A systematic review study. Journal of Clinical Diagnostic Research 2016;10:7‐11. [Google Scholar]
  27. Melin-Johansson C, Palmqvist R, Ronnberg L. Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision-making-A mixed-studies review. J Clin Nurs 2017;26:3936‐49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs (NY): Prentice Hall, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  29. Baldwin A, Mills J, Birks M, Budden L. Role modeling in undergraduate nursing education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:e18‐e26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Coram C. Expert role modeling effect on novice nursing students’ clinical judgment. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12:385‐91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson EA, Lasater K, Hodson-Carlton K, Siktberg L, Sideras, S., Dillard N. Geriatrics in simulation: Role modeling and clinical judgment effect. Nurs Educ Perspect 2012;33:176‐80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors − enablers and barriers − affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonald EW, Boulton JL, Davis JL. E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge-An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today 2018;66:166‐74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dastous A. Contribution d’activités d’apprentissage coopératif au développement de la compétence à poser un jugement clinique d’infirmières expertes en soins critiques. Mémoire présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de maîtrise en sciences infirmières (M. Sc.), option formation. Université de Montréal: Papyrus, 2021. Disponible sur : https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/26210. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.