EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 24 / Numéro 1 (2023) Pédagogie Médicale, 24 1 (2023) 51-59 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Numéro 1, 2023
Page(s) 51 - 59
Section Concepts et Innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2022033
Publié en ligne 3 janvier 2023
  1. Décret n°2019-1125 du 4 novembre 2019 relatif à l’accès aux formations de médecine, de pharmacie, d’odontologie et de maïeutique. Journal Officiel de la République Française 2019;(0257): NOR : ESRS1930492D. [On-line] Disponible sur : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gagnon R. Les entrevues structurées multiples pour la sélection des candidats aux programmes de formation en médecine. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:5‐6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004;38:314‐26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen MK, Lykkegaard E, Lund O, O’Neill LD. Qualitative analysis of MMI raters’ scorings of medical school candidates: A matter of taste? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018;23:289‐310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Callwood A, Jeevaratnam K, Kotronoulas G, Schneider A, Lewis L, Nadarajah VD. Personal domains assessed in multiple mini interviews (MMIs) for healthcare student selection: a narrative synthesis systematic review. Nurse Educ Today 2018;64:56‐64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dore KL, Kreuger S, Ladhani M, Rolfson D, Kurtz D, Kulasegaram K, et al. The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions. Acad Med 2010;85(10Suppl):S60‐63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leduc J-M, Rioux R, Gagnon R, Bourdy C, Dennis A. Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews. Med Teach 2017;39:285‐94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cleland J, Chu J, Lim S, Low J, Low-Beer N, Kwek TK. COVID-19: designing and conducting an online mini-multiple interview (MMI) in a dynamic landscape. Med Teach 2020;42:776‐80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Amand M, Richard I, Lerolle N, de Sousa AA, Mallet S, Saint-André J-P, et al. PluriPASS, première année commune aux études de santé (PACES) adaptée de l’Université d’Angers : caractérisation et suivi de la population étudiante sur les trois semestres du dispositif. Pédagogie Médicale 2020;21:131‐41. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacquet A, Riou J, Letertre E, Passirani C, Saint-André J-P. Fidélité, équité et impact des mini entretiens multiples dans le processus de sélection des étudiants en santé en France. Pédagogie Médicale 2017;18:179‐88. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Renaud J-S, Cantat A, Lakhal S, Bourget M, St-Onge C. Sélection des candidats en médecine : validité prédictive des mini entrevues multiples en contexte francophone. Pédagogie Médicale 2016;17:7‐21. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Detroz P, Loye N. Sélection des futurs médecins : sur quelles bases empiriques ? Pédagogie Médicale 2018;19:37‐50. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, McCrorie P, McManus C, et al. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011;33:215‐23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med 2004;79(10Suppl):S40‐42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. The relationship between interviewers’ characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med 2004;79:602‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 2009;43:767‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Baker KD, Sabo RT, Rawls M, Feldman M, Santen SA. Versatility in multiple mini-interview implementation: rater background does not significantly influence assessment scoring. Med Teach 2020;42:411‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Burton BN, Labastide AS, Muhoozi BN, Lopez-Ramos CG, Anders AT, Garcia K, et al. Socioeconomic status and mock interview performance among prospective Medical School applicants. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2020;31:105‐14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eva KW, Macala C, Fleming B. Twelve tips for constructing a multiple mini-interview. Med Teach 2019;41:510‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dodson M, Crotty B, Prideaux D, Carne R, Ward A, de Leeuw E. The multiple mini-interview: How long is long enough? Med Educ 2009;43:168‐74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen YS, Fall AA, Khoo C, Nadarajah VD. The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training – A systematic review. Med Teach 2013;35:1027‐41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Knorr M, Hissbach J. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ 2014;48:1157‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eva KW, Macala C. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: ’tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Med Educ 2014;48:604‐13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dowell J, Lynch B, Till H, Kumwenda B, Husbands A. The multiple mini-interview in the U.K. context: 3 years of experience at Dundee. Med Teach 2012;34:297‐304. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Brien A, Harvey J, Shannon M, Lewis K, Valencia O. A comparison of multiple mini-interviews and structured interviews in a UK setting. Med Teach 2011;33:397‐402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gärtner J, Bußenius L, Prediger S, Vogel D, Harendza S. Need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism in medical school applicants. BMC Med Educ 2020;20. [Google Scholar]
  27. Griffin B, Wilson I. Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17:377‐88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Duff RE, Katcher PA, Daniels RM, Ramaswamy V. The Multiple Mini Interview as a Dental School Admission Tool: can it predict noncognitive traits associated with professional behaviors? J Dent Educ 2020;84:478‐85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oliver T, Hecker K, Hausdorf PA, Conlon P. Validating MMI scores: are we measuring multiple attributes? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19:379‐92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bégin P, Gagnon R, Leduc J-M., Paradis B, Renaud J-S, Beauchamp J, et al. Accuracy of rating scale interval values used in multiple mini-interviews: a mixed methods study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2021;26:37‐51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Brownell K, Lockyer J, Collin T, Lemay J-F. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007;29:394‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hadad A, Gafni N, Moshinsky A, Turvall E, Ziv A, Israeli A. The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school. Med Teach 2016;38:1172‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Henderson MC, Kelly CJ, Griffin E, Hall TR, Jerant A, Peterson EM, et al. Medical School applicant characteristics associated with performance in multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med 2018;93:1029‐34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Terregino CA, Copeland HL, Laumbach SG, Mehan D, Dunleavy D, Geiger T. How good are we at selecting students that meet our mission? Outcomes of the 2011 and 2012 entering classes selected by a locally developed multiple mini interview. Med Teach 2018;40:1300‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee HJ, Park SB, Park SC, Park WS, Ryu S-W., Yang JH, et al. Multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical school. BMC Res Notes 2016;9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, Peterson EM, et al. Do admissions multiple mini-interview and traditional interview scores predict subsequent academic performance? A study of five California Medical Schools. Acad Med 2019;94:388‐95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Breil SM, Forthmann B, Hertel-Waszak A, Ahrens H, Brouwer B, Schönefeld E, et al. Construct validity of multiple mini interviews – Investigating the role of stations, skills, and raters using Bayesian G-theory. Med Teach 2020;42:164‐71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reiter HI, Salvatori P, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Eva KW. The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews. Med Educ 2006;40:36‐42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Raghavan M, Martin BD. Multiple mini interview performance of repeat applicants to medical school admission. Med J Aust 2014;201:383‐4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Knorr M, Meyer H, Sehner S, Hampe W, Zimmermann S. Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rees EL, Hawarden AW, Dent G, Hays R, Bates J, Hassell AB. Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37. Med Teach 2016;38:443‐55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roberts C, Rothnie I, Zoanetti N, Crossley J. Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview? Med Educ 2010;44:690‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jerant A, Fancher T, Fenton JJ, Fiscella K, Sousa F, Franks P, et al. How Medical School applicant race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status relate to multiple mini-interview-based admissions outcomes: Findings from one Medical School. Acad Med 2015;90:1667‐74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Terregino CA, McConnell M, Reiter HI. The effect of differential weighting of academics, experiences, and competencies measured by multiple mini interview (MMI) on race and ethnicity of cohorts accepted to one Medical School. Acad Med 2015;90:1651‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ 2016;50:36‐60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kelly ME, Patterson F, O’Flynn S, Mulligan J, Murphy AW. A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Foo J, Rivers G, Allen L, Ilic D, Maloney S, Hay M. The economic costs of selecting medical students: an Australian case study. Med Educ 2020;54:643‐51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Alaki SM, Yamany IA, Shinawi LA, Hassan MHA, Tekian A. Can multiple mini-interviews predict academic performance of dental students? A two-year follow-up. J Dent Educ 2016;80:1376‐83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Barbour ME, Sandy JR. Multiple mini interviews for selection of dental students: influence of gender and starting station. J Dent Educ 2014;78:589‐96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. McAndrew R, Ellis J, Valentine RA. Does a selection interview predict year 1 performance in dental school? Eur J Dent Educ 2017;21:108‐12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Callwood A, Cooke D, Bolger S, Lemanska A, Allan H. The reliability and validity of multiple mini interviews (MMIs) in values based recruitment to nursing, midwifery and paramedic practice programmes: findings from an evaluation study. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;77:138‐44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Cameron AJ, Mackeigan LD. Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program. Am J Pharm Educ 2012;76:10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Corelli RL, Muchnik MA, Beechinor RJ, Fong G, Vogt EM, Cocohoba JM, et al. Perceptions and cost-analysis of a multiple mini-interview in a Pharmacy School admissions process. Am J Pharm Educ 2015;79. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cowart K, Dell K, Rodriguez-Snapp N, Petrelli HMW. An examination of correlations between MMI scores and Pharmacy School GPA. Am J Pharm Educ 2016;80. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cameron AJ, MacKeigan LD, Mitsakakis N, Pugsley JA. Multiple mini-interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination. Med Educ 2017;51:379‐89. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Clark JR, Miller CA, Garwood EL. Rethinking the admissions interview: piloting multiple mini-interviews in a Graduate Psychology Program. Psychol Rep 2020;123:1869‐86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hecker K, Donnon T, Fuentealba C, Hall D, Illanes O, Morck DW, et al. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method. J Vet Med Educ 2009;36:166‐73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Perkins A, Burton L, Dray B, Elcock K. Evaluation of a multiple-mini-interview protocol used as a selection tool for entry to an undergraduate nursing programme. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:465‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Thomas A, Young ME, Mazer BL, Lubarsky SE, Razack SI. Candidates’ and interviewers’ perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program. Occup Ther Health Care 2015;29:186‐200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ 2016;50:36‐60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.