Free Access
| Issue |
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Number 1, 2023
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 61 - 68 | |
| Section | Concepts et Innovations | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2022035 | |
| Published online | 22 février 2023 | |
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Genève: OMS, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education Inc., 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Palaganas JC, Epps C, Raemer DB. A history of simulation-enhanced interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2014;28:110‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Botma Y. Consensus on interprofessional facilitator capabilities. J Interprof Care 2019;33:277‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houzé-Cerfon CH, Boet S, Marhar F, Saint-Jean M, Geeraerts T. L’éducation interprofessionnelle des équipes de soins critiques par la simulation : concept, mise en œuvre et évaluation. Presse Med 2019;48:780‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Picchiottino P. Apprendre à collaborer, un défi pour la qualité des soins. Sage-femme.ch 2016;9:26‐9. [Google Scholar]
- van Gessel E, Picchiottino P, Doureradjam R, Nendaz M, Mèche P. Interprofessional training: Start with the youngest! A program for undergraduate healthcare students in Geneva, Switzerland. Med Teach 2018;40:595‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2:115‐25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivière E, Jaffrelot M, Jouquan J, Chiniara G. Debriefing for the transfer of learning: the importance of context. Acad Med 2019;94:796‐803. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon P, Raemer D, Rudolph J. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare (DASH)© Rater’s Handbook. Boston (MA): The Center for Medical Simulation, 2010 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://harvardmedsim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DASH.handbook.2010.Final.Rev.2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12:S16‐20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. BEME Guide No.1: Best Evidence Medical Education. Med Teach 1999;21:553‐62. [Google Scholar]
- Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10:106‐15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. A national interprofessional competency framework. Vancouver (BC), 2010 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://phabc.org/public-health-core-competency-development/resources/cihc-national-interprofessional-competency-framework/#main. [Google Scholar]
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS 2.0. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019. [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- Paignon A, Conti JW, Cerutti B, Fassier T. French translation and validation of the interprofessional facilitation scale for simulation. J Interprof Care 2021;35:803‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans S, Shaw N, Ward C, Hayley A. “Refreshed… reinforced… reflective”: A qualitative exploration of interprofessional education facilitators’ own interprofessional learning and collaborative practice. J Interprof Care 2016;30:702‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.