Accès gratuit
| Numéro |
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 24, Numéro 1, 2023
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 61 - 68 | |
| Section | Concepts et Innovations | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2022035 | |
| Publié en ligne | 22 février 2023 | |
- Organisation mondiale de la Santé. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Genève: OMS, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education Inc., 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Palaganas JC, Epps C, Raemer DB. A history of simulation-enhanced interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2014;28:110‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Botma Y. Consensus on interprofessional facilitator capabilities. J Interprof Care 2019;33:277‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houzé-Cerfon CH, Boet S, Marhar F, Saint-Jean M, Geeraerts T. L’éducation interprofessionnelle des équipes de soins critiques par la simulation : concept, mise en œuvre et évaluation. Presse Med 2019;48:780‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Picchiottino P. Apprendre à collaborer, un défi pour la qualité des soins. Sage-femme.ch 2016;9:26‐9. [Google Scholar]
- van Gessel E, Picchiottino P, Doureradjam R, Nendaz M, Mèche P. Interprofessional training: Start with the youngest! A program for undergraduate healthcare students in Geneva, Switzerland. Med Teach 2018;40:595‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2:115‐25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivière E, Jaffrelot M, Jouquan J, Chiniara G. Debriefing for the transfer of learning: the importance of context. Acad Med 2019;94:796‐803. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon P, Raemer D, Rudolph J. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare (DASH)© Rater’s Handbook. Boston (MA): The Center for Medical Simulation, 2010 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://harvardmedsim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DASH.handbook.2010.Final.Rev.2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12:S16‐20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. BEME Guide No.1: Best Evidence Medical Education. Med Teach 1999;21:553‐62. [Google Scholar]
- Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10:106‐15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. A national interprofessional competency framework. Vancouver (BC), 2010 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://phabc.org/public-health-core-competency-development/resources/cihc-national-interprofessional-competency-framework/#main. [Google Scholar]
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS 2.0. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019. [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- Paignon A, Conti JW, Cerutti B, Fassier T. French translation and validation of the interprofessional facilitation scale for simulation. J Interprof Care 2021;35:803‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans S, Shaw N, Ward C, Hayley A. “Refreshed… reinforced… reflective”: A qualitative exploration of interprofessional education facilitators’ own interprofessional learning and collaborative practice. J Interprof Care 2016;30:702‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.