Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 18, Number 2, Mai 2017
Page(s) 83 - 100
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2018007
Published online 5 juillet 2018
  1. Parent F, Jouquan J. Comment élaborer et analyser un référentiel de compétences en santé ? Une clarification conceptuelle et méthodologique de l’approche par compétences. Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck Supérieur, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Scallon G. L’évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétence. Montréal : Renouveau pédagogique, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, Ferentz K, Martin C. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med 2002;77:361‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A, Cadzow A, Beggs K, Colthart I, et al. The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach 2009;31:299‐318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tardif J. L’évaluation des compétences. Documenter le parcours de développement. Montréal : Chenelière Éducation, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tannenbaum D, Kerr J, Konkin J, Organek A, Parsons E, Saucier D, et al. Cursus Triple C axé sur le développement des compétences. Rapport du Groupe de travail sur la révision du cursus postdoctoral – Partie 1. Mississauga (ON) : Collège des médecins de famille du Canada, 2011 [On-line]. Disponible sur : http://www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Resources/Resource_Items/Triple_C/2%20Les%20concepts%20et%20définitions%20clés%20%20de%20l1éducation%20axée%20sur%20le%20développement%20des%20compétencesPDF%20ppt.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oandasan I, Saucier D (Eds.). Rapport sur le Cursus Triple C axé sur le développement des compétences – Partie 2 : Faire progresser la mise en œuvre. Mississauga (ON) : Collège des médecins de famille du Canada, 2013 [On-line]. Disponible sur : http://www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Education/_PDFs/TripleC_Rapport_2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carraccio CL, Benson BJ, Nixon LJ, Derstine PL. From the educational bench to the clinical bedside: Translating the Dreyfus Developmental Model to the learning of clinical skills. Acad Med 2008;83:761‐7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meade LB, Borden SH, McArdle P, Rosenblum MJ, Picchioni MS, Hinchey KT. From theory to actual practice: creation and application of milestones in an internal medicine residency program, 2004-2010. Med Teach 2012;34:717‐23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Papp KK, Huang GC, Lauzon Clabo LM, Delva D, Fischer M, Konopasek L, et al. Milestones of critical thinking: a developmental model for medicine and nursing. Acad Med 2014;89:715-20. [Google Scholar]
  11. The family medicine milestone project. J Grad Med Educ 2014;6(1 Suppl 1):74-86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baglia J, Foster E, Dostal J, Keister D, Biery N, Larson D. Generating developmentally appropriate competency assessment at a family medicine residency. Fam Med 2011;43:90‐8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. American Association of Medical Colleges. Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency – Curriculum developers’ guide. 2014 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Core%20EPA%20Curriculum%20Dev%20Guide.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang A, Bowen JL, Buranosky RA, Frankel RM, Ghosh N, Rosenblum MJ, et al. Transforming primary care training-patient-centered medical home entrustable professional activities for internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:801‐9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fessler HE, Addrizzo-Harris D, Beck JM, Buckley JD, Pastores SM, Piquette CA, et al. Entrustable professional activities and curricular milestones for fellowship training in pulmonary and critical care medicine: report of a multisociety working group. Chest 2014;146:813‐34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schultz K, Griffiths J, Lacasse M. The application of entrustable professional activities to inform competency decisions in a family medicine residency program. Acad Med 2015;90:888‐97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Clavet D, Pélissier-Simard L, Bigonnesse J-M, Girard G (Eds.) Systematising field supervisors’ experience to guide residents’ progression in a family medicine competency-based curriculum. Canadian Conf Med Educ 2010, St. John’s (NL). [Google Scholar]
  18. Torbeck L, Wrightson AS. A method for defining competency-based promotion criteria for family medicine residents. Acad Med 2005;80:832‐9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542-7. [Google Scholar]
  20. ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ 2005;3:1176-7. [Google Scholar]
  21. ten Cate O. AM Last Page: What Entrustable Professional Activities Add to a Competency-Based Curriculum. Acad Med 2014;89:691. [Google Scholar]
  22. ten Cate O. Trust, competence, and the supervisor’s role in postgraduate training. BMJ 2006;333:748-51. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hauer KE, Kohlwes J, Cornett P, Hollander H, Ten Cate O, Ranji SR, et al. Identifying entrustable professional activities in internal medicine training. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:54-9. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lacasse M, Theoret J, Tessier S, Arsenault L. Expectations of clinical teachers and faculty regarding development of the CanMEDS-Family Medicine competencies: Laval developmental benchmarks scale for family medicine residency training. Teach Learn Med 2014;26:244‐51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shumway NM, Dacus JJ, Lathrop KI, Hernandez EP, Miller M, Karnad AB. Use of milestones and development of entrustable professional activities in 2 hematology/oncology training programs. J Grad Med Educ 2015:101‐4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huddle TS, Heudebert GR. Taking apart the art: the risk of anatomizing clinical competence. Acad Med 2007;82(8):676-82. [Google Scholar]
  27. van Loon KA, Driessen EW, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. Experiences with EPAs, potential benefits and pitfalls. Med Teach 2014;36(8):698‐702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott A, Knott M. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 1974;30:507‐12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. St-Pierre A, Thériault A, Labrecque M, Turcotte S, Renaud J-S, Lacasse M. Validation of the Laval Developmental Benchmark scale for competency evaluation in family medicine residency. Ottawa Conf, 2014 [On-line]. Disponible sur : http://media.wix.com/ugd/bd1cfc_8ef41237a92847fc87354972c9bd22d8.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JA. The think aloud method: a practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  31. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res 2003;12:229‐38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 2003;42:57‐63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Willis GB, Royston P, Bercini D. The use of verbal report methods in the development and testing of survey questionnaires. Appl Cognit Psychol 1991;5:251‐67. [Google Scholar]
  34. Forsyth B, Levin K, Fisher S. Test of an appraisal method for establishment survey questionnaires. Proceeding of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods American Statistical Association, Alexandria 1999. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bolton RN. Pretesting questionnaires: content analyses of respondents’ concurrent verbal protocols. Mark sci 1993;12:280‐303. [Google Scholar]
  36. Graesser AC, Bommareddy S, Swamer S, Golding JM. Integrating questionnaire design with a cognitive computational model of human question answering. Schwarz N, Sudman S, Editors. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tourangeau R, Rasinski KA. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol Bull 1988;103:299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lacasse M. Diagnostic et prise en charge des situations d’apprentissage problématiques en éducation médicale. Québec : Université Laval, Faculté de médecine, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 1992;89:91‐7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Simard M-L., Lacasse M, Simard C, Renaud J-S., Tremblay I, Rheault C, et al. Validation d’un outil critérié d’évaluation des compétences des résidents en médecine familiale : étude qualitative du processus de réponse. Pédagogie Médicale 2017;18:17‐24. [Google Scholar]
  41. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010;32:676-82. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.