Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 16, Numéro 1, février 2015
Page(s) 79 - 84
Section Communication brève
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2015013
Publié en ligne 13 août 2015
  1. Ericsson KA. Deliberate Practice and the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expert Performance in Medicine and Related Domains. Acad Med 2004;79(10 suppl): S70-S81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  3. Eva KW, Regehr G, Gruppen L. Blinded by “insight”. Self-assessment and its role in performance improvement. In BD Hodges and L Lingard (Ed.) The question of competence. London: Cornell University Press, 2012.
  4. Sargeant J, Bruce, D, Campbell, CM. Practicing Physicians’ Needs for Assessment and Feedback as Part of Professional Development. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2013;33:S54-S62. [CrossRef]
  5. Archer, J. State of the Science in Health Professional Education: Effective Feedback. Med Educ 2010:44: 101-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Eva KW, Regehr G. Effective Feedback for Maintenance of Competence: From Data Delivery to Trusting Dialogues. CMAJ 2013;185:463-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA 2009;302: 1330-1. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Giroux M, Girard G. Favoriser la position d’apprentissage grâce à l’interaction superviseur-supervisé. Pédagogie Médicale 2009;10:193-210. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  9. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Factors Influencing Responsiveness to Feedback: on the Interplay Between Fear, Confidence, and Reasoning Processes. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2012;17:15-26. [CrossRef]
  10. Bok GJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JPI, Van Beukelen P, Jaarsma ADC, Van der Vleuten CPM: Clarifying Students’ Feedback-Seeking Behaviour in Clinical Clerkships. Med Educ 2013;47:282-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernagbeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty Staff Perceptions of Feedback to Residents after Direct Observation of Clinical Skills. Med Educ 2012;46:201-15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pelgrim E, Kramer AWM, Mokkink HGA, van der Vleuten, CPM. Factors Influencing Trainers’ Feedback-Giving Behavior: a Cross-Sectional Survey. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14: 65 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/65
  13. Sargeant J, Mann KV, Van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF: Reflection: a Link Between Receiving and Using Assessment Feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009;14:399-410. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Côté L, Bordage G, Content and Conceptual Frameworks of Preceptor Feedback Related to Residents’ Educational Needs. Acad Med 2012;87:1274-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Côté L, Gingras N. Réponses et cadres conceptuels des cliniciens enseignants lors de discussions de cas avec des internes en psychiatrie. Pédagogie Médicale 2013;14:169-86. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  16. Côté L, Gromaire P, Bordage G. Content and Rationale of Junior and Senior Preceptors Responding to Residents’ Educational Needs Revisited. Teach Learn Med, sous presse.
  17. Bordage G. Conceptual Frameworks to Illuminate and Magnify. Med Educ 2009;43:312-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jouquan J, Parent F, Audétat MC. Des analogies entre le raisonnement médical et l'évaluation formative. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 2013; XVIII(1):93-106.
  19. Irby, D. How Attending Physicians Make Instructional Decisions When Conducting Teaching Round. Acad Med 1992;67:630-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Irby, D. What Clinical Teachers Need to Know. Acad Med 1994;69:333-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “Educational Alliance” as a Framework for Reconceptualizing Feedback in Medical Education. Acad Med 2015;90: 609-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.