EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 10 / Numéro 1 (Février 2009) Pédagogie Médicale, 10 1 (2009) 29-39 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 10, Number 1, Février 2009
Page(s) 29 - 39
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.2515/pedmed/20080347
Published online 18 mars 2009
  1. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psycho Rev 1993;100:363-406. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Paul J. Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Irby, DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:898-931. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kilminster SM, Joly BC. Effective supervision in clinical settings: a literature review. Med Educ 2000;34:827-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowen JL, Irby DM. Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: a review of the literature. Acad Med 2002;77:621-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250:777-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM. Developing the teaching instinct, 1: Feedback. Med Teach 2002;24:245-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Brien HV, Marks MB, Charlin B.Le feedback (ou retro-action). Un élément essentiel de l'intervention pédagogique en milieu clinique. Pédagogie médicale 2003;4:184-91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. Jour Am Board of Fam Pract 1992;5:419-24. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS : A learner-centered model for outpatient education. Acad. Med. 2003;78:893-8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lillich DW, Mace K, Goodell K, Kinnee C. Active precepting in the residency clinic: A pilot study of a new model. Fam Med 2005;37:205-10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Westberg J, Jason H. Fostering learners' reflection and self-assessment. Fam Med 1994;26:278-82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gruppen LD. Implications of cognitive research for ambulatory care education. Acad Med 1997;72:117-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Connell KJ, Bordage G, Chang RW, Howard BA, Sinacore J. Measuring promotion of thinking during precepting encounters in outpatient settings. Acad Med 1999; 74 Supplement: S10-S12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Branch WT, Paranjape AP. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med 2002;77:1185-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bowen JL. Educational diagnostic reasoning. New Engl J Med 2007;355:2217-25. [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinert Y, Mann K, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. A systematic review of faculty development initiative designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Med Teach 2006; 28:497-526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Compendium de références bibliographiques et de résumés sur la recherche et l'intervention en formation à distance Université du Québec, Téluq, 2004. [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.teluq.uquebec.ca/webteluq/extras/fad/compendium.html [Google Scholar]
  19. Audet L. Réseau d'enseignement francophone à distance du Canada (REFAD). Pour franchir la distance. Guide de formation et de soutien aux enseignants et formateurs en formation à distance. [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.refad.ca/nouveau/guide_formateurs_FAD/guide_formateurs_FAD.html [Google Scholar]
  20. La formation ouverte et à distance (F.O.A.D.). Académie de Bordeaux. [On-line] Disponible sur : http://formation.ac-bordeaux.fr/formation/fo_foad_ava.html [Google Scholar]
  21. Dewey J. How We Think. Boston: Heath, 1933. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tardif J. Pour un enseignement stratégique. Montréal : Éditions Logiques, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bandura A. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  25. Harden RD. Curriculum planning and development. Dans : Dent, JA et Harden, RM (eds). A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers, Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Réseau de valorisation de l'enseignement, Guide de conception pédagogique et graphique d'un site éducatif sur le réseau Internet. Université Laval : Québec, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lebrun M. E Learning pour enseigner et apprendre : Allier pédagogie et technologie. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique: Academia Bruylant, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Barrows HS. Innovations without appropriate assessment are limited usefulness. Teach Learn Med 2008;20:287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Côté L, Turgeon J. Comment lire de façon critique les articles de recherche qualitative en médecine. Pédagogie Médicale. 2002;3:81-90. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.