EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 10 / Numéro 1 (Février 2009) Pédagogie Médicale, 10 1 (2009) 41-53 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 10, Number 1, Février 2009
Page(s) 41 - 53
Section Références
DOI https://doi.org/10.2515/pedmed/20080318
Published online 18 mars 2009
  1. Boud D, Falchikov N. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education 1989;18:529-59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med 1991;66:762-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2002;7:63-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005;80(10 Suppl):S46-S54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eva KW, Regehr G. I'll never play professional football and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:14-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008;30:124-45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 1st edition ed. New York: Freeman; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot:1996. [Google Scholar]
  9. Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J. Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:5-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Epstein RM. Mindful Practice. JAMA 1999;282:833-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson TO, Narens L. Why investigate metacognition? In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP, (Eds.). Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge: MIT Press;1994:1-25. [Google Scholar]
  12. Son LK, Schwartz BL. The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In: Perfect TJ, Schwartz BL (Eds.) Applied Metacognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:15-38. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacques A, Goulet F, Leboeuf S. Le maintien des compétences : un enjeu professionnel. Pédagogie Médicale 2002;3:116-21. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dory V, Beaulieu MD, Pestiaux D, Pouchain D, Gay B, Rocher G et al. The development of self-efficacy beliefs during general practice vocational training: An exploratory study. Med Teach 2008;1-6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094-102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Albanese M, Dottl S, Mejicano G, Zakowski L, Seibert C, Van Eyck S et al. Distorted perceptions of competence and incompetence are more than regression effects. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006;11:267-78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species. Houston (TX): Gulf Publishing, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  18. Norman G. The adult learner: a mythical species. Acad Med 1999;7:886-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-S81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Butler DL, Winne PH. Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Rev Educ Res 1995;65:245-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin D, Regehr G, Hodges B, McNaughton N. Using videotaped benchmarks to improve the self-assessment ability of family practice residents. Acad Med 1998;73:1201-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ward M, MacRae H, Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Poulin E, Reznick R et al. Resident self-assessment of operative performance. Am J Surg 2003;185:521-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Brien HV, Marks MB, Charlin B. Le feedback (ou rétro-action) : un élément essentiel de l'intervention pédagogique en milieu clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2003;4:184-91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mann K, Gordon J, Macleod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Directed self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:47-54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Duffy FD, Lynn LA, Didura H, Hess B, Caverzagie K, Grosso L et al. Self-assessment of practice performance: development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:38-46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Silver I, Campbell C, Marlow B, Sargeant J. Self-assessment and continuing professional development: the Canadian perspective. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:25-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006;(2). Art. No.: CD000259. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006;28:117-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003;23:4-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.