EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 10 / Numéro 1 (Février 2009) Pédagogie Médicale, 10 1 (2009) 41-53 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 10, Numéro 1, Février 2009
Page(s) 41 - 53
Section Références
DOI https://doi.org/10.2515/pedmed/20080318
Publié en ligne 18 mars 2009
  1. Boud D, Falchikov N. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education 1989;18:529-59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med 1991;66:762-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2002;7:63-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005;80(10 Suppl):S46-S54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eva KW, Regehr G. I'll never play professional football and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:14-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008;30:124-45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 1st edition ed. New York: Freeman; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot:1996. [Google Scholar]
  9. Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J. Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:5-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Epstein RM. Mindful Practice. JAMA 1999;282:833-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson TO, Narens L. Why investigate metacognition? In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP, (Eds.). Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge: MIT Press;1994:1-25. [Google Scholar]
  12. Son LK, Schwartz BL. The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In: Perfect TJ, Schwartz BL (Eds.) Applied Metacognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:15-38. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacques A, Goulet F, Leboeuf S. Le maintien des compétences : un enjeu professionnel. Pédagogie Médicale 2002;3:116-21. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dory V, Beaulieu MD, Pestiaux D, Pouchain D, Gay B, Rocher G et al. The development of self-efficacy beliefs during general practice vocational training: An exploratory study. Med Teach 2008;1-6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094-102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Albanese M, Dottl S, Mejicano G, Zakowski L, Seibert C, Van Eyck S et al. Distorted perceptions of competence and incompetence are more than regression effects. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006;11:267-78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species. Houston (TX): Gulf Publishing, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  18. Norman G. The adult learner: a mythical species. Acad Med 1999;7:886-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-S81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Butler DL, Winne PH. Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Rev Educ Res 1995;65:245-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin D, Regehr G, Hodges B, McNaughton N. Using videotaped benchmarks to improve the self-assessment ability of family practice residents. Acad Med 1998;73:1201-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ward M, MacRae H, Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Poulin E, Reznick R et al. Resident self-assessment of operative performance. Am J Surg 2003;185:521-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Brien HV, Marks MB, Charlin B. Le feedback (ou rétro-action) : un élément essentiel de l'intervention pédagogique en milieu clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2003;4:184-91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mann K, Gordon J, Macleod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Directed self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:47-54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Duffy FD, Lynn LA, Didura H, Hess B, Caverzagie K, Grosso L et al. Self-assessment of practice performance: development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:38-46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Silver I, Campbell C, Marlow B, Sargeant J. Self-assessment and continuing professional development: the Canadian perspective. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:25-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006;(2). Art. No.: CD000259. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006;28:117-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003;23:4-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.