Accès gratuit
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 14, Numéro 1, février 2013
Page(s) 49 - 72
Section Références
Publié en ligne 27 mars 2013
  1. Grant J, Gale R. Changing medical education. Med Educ 1989;23:252-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Regehr G. It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010;44:31-39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:156-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010;44:358-66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpiano RM, Daley DM. A guide and glossary on post-positivist theory building for population health. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2006; 60:564-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 2009;43:312–319. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mann KV. The role of educational theory in continuing medical education: Has it helped us? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24(Suppl 1):S22–S30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bleakley A. Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Med Educ 2006;40:150-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Patel VL, Yoskowitz NA, Arocha JF. Towards effective evaluation and reform in medical education: A cognitive and learning sciences perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:791-812. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Patel VL, Yoskowitz NA, Arocha JF, Shortliffe EH. Cognitive and learning sciences in biomedical and health instructional design: A review with lessons for biomedical informatics education. J Biomed Inform 2009;2:176-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ 2011;45:60-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education–Part 1: Sources of information. Med Teach 2003;25:352-63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education–Part 2: Constructing searches. Med Teach 2003;25:463-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook DA, Andriole DA, Durning SJ, Roberts NK, Triola MM. Longitudinal research databases in medical education: Facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions. Acad Med 2010;85:1340-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: Many informative elements missing. Med Educ 2007;41:1074-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. BMJ 2007;335:333-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:42-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ 1997;315:740-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a288. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ 2008;337:a1020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Discourse analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a879. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 2008;337:a567. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kvale S. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a1035. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Swanson DB, Case SM, Nungester RJ. Validity of NBME Part I and Part II in prediction of Part III performance. Acad Med 1991;66:S7–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, Wnrich MD. Predictive validity of certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Ann Int Med 1989;110:719-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Haynes R. Forming research questions. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:881-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wulf G, Shea CH. Principles derived from the study of simple skills donot generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev 2002;9:185-211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Illeris K. The three dimensions of learning. Copenhagen: RoskildeUniversity Press/Leicester: NIACE, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Norman GR, Wenghofer E, Klass D. Predicting doctor performance outcomes of curriculum interventions: Problem-based learning and continuing competence. Med Educ 2008;42:794-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee WD, Hanley JA, Norcini J, Girard N, Grand’Maison P, Brailovsky C. Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. JAMA 2002;288:3019-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cadieux G, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, Tamblyn R. Are physicians with better clinical skills on licensing examinations less likely to prescribe antibiotics for viral respiratory infections in ambulatory care settings? Med Care 2011;49:156-65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2004;79:244-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Teherani A, Hodgson CS, Banach M, Papadakis MA. Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2005;80:S17–S20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Colliver JA, Markwell SJ, Verhulst SJ, Robbs RS. The prognostic value of documented unprofessional behavior in medical school records for predicting and preventing subsequent medical board disciplinary action: The Papadakis studies revisited. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:213-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science – Time for a new vision. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 1621-3. [Google Scholar]
  39. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13-24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubio DM, Schoenbaum EE, Lee LS, Schteingart DE, Marantz PR, Anderson KE, Platt LD, Baez A, Esposito K. Defining translational research: Implications for training. Acad Med 2010:85:470-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Slotnick HB. How doctors learn: Physicians’ self-directed learning episodes. Acad Med 1999;74:1106-17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No. 35. Med Teach 2008;30:652-66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McGaghie WC. Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med 2010;2:19cm8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10(Suppl 1):21-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Eva KW. On the limits of systematicity. Med Educ 2008;42:852-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach 2006;28:497-526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Steinert Y, McLeod PJ, Boillat M, Meterissian S, Elizov M, Macdonald ME. Faculty development: A “field of dreams”? Med Educ 2009;43:42-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Hanna SE, Makarski J. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: Performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ 2010;182:1045-52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJ, Hofmeyer A. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:25-36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ward VL, House AO, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: Exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tunis SR, Benner J, McClellan M. Comparative effectiveness research:Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure. Stat Med 2010;29:1963-76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kirkpatrick D. Evaluating training programs. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Kochler,1998. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.