Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 13, Numéro 4, novembre 2012
Page(s) 247 - 255
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2012021
Publié en ligne 18 décembre 2012
  1. Davis D, O'Brien Thomson MA, Freemantie N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mansouri M, Lockyer J. A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness. JCEHP 2007;27:6-15.
  3. Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ 2006;30:159-67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger III HL. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:959-66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci 2006;17:249-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ 2009;43:21-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. McDaniel MA, Anderson JL, Derbish MH, Morrisette N. Testing the testing effect in the classroom. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2007;19:494-513. [CrossRef]
  8. McDaniel MA, Roediger HL, 3rd, McDermott KB. Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychon Bull Rev 2007;14:200-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kang SHK, McDermott KB, Roediger HLI. Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2007;19:528-58. [CrossRef]
  10. Pashler H, Cepeda HJ, Rohrer D, Wixted JT. When does feedback facilitate learning of words? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2005;31:3-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Scallon G. L'évaluation formative. Saint-Laurent (Qc) : Éditions du Renouveau Pédagogique, 2000.
  12. Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik CLC, Kulik JA, Morgan MT. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 1991; 61:213-38. [CrossRef]
  13. Lepper MR, Master A, Yow WQ. Intrinsic motivation in education. In: Maehr ML, Karabenick SA, Urdan TC, editors. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Social Psychological Perspectives. First Edition ed. Bingley (UK): Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008: 521-56.
  14. St-Onge C, Landry M, Xhignesse M, Voyer G, Tremblay-Lavoie S, Mamede S, et al. Expertise and diagnostic performance in family praticians. Manuscript submitted.
  15. Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Penaforte JC. Effect of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Med Educ 2008;42:468-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teach Educ 2007;23:239-50. [CrossRef]
  17. van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:41-67. [CrossRef]
  18. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger III HL. Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 2009;43:1174-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Norman GR, Shannon SI, Marrin ML. The need for needs assessment in continuing medical education. BMJ 2004;328:999-1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Davis P, Kvern B, Donen N, Andrews E, Nixon O. Evaluation of a problem-based learning workshop using pre- and post-test objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients. JCEHP 2000;20:164-70.
  21. Finlay K, McLaren S. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal. Qual Prim Care 2009;17:387-95.
  22. Smits PBA, Verbeek JHAM, de Buisonjé CD. Problem based learning in continuing medical education: A review of controlled evaluation studies. BMJ 2002;324:153-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2001;20:61-67. [CrossRef]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.