Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 12, Numéro 4, novembre 2011
Page(s) 223 - 229
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2011109
Publié en ligne 14 mars 2012
  1. Audétat MC, Laurin S, Sanche G, Béïque C, Caire-Fon N, Blais J, et al. Clinical reasoning difficulties: a taxonomy for clinical teachers. Med Teach 2011: Soumis pour publication.
  2. Szumacher E, Catton P, Jones G, Bradley R, Kwan J, Cherryman F, et al. Helping Learners in Difficulty- The Incidence and Effectiveness of Remedial Programmes of the Medical Radiation Sciences Programme at University of Toronto and the Michener Institute for Applied Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:725-34.
  3. Frellsen SL, Baker EA, Papp KK, Durning SJ. Medical School Policies Regarding Struggling Medical Students During the Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National Survey. Acad Med 2008;83:876-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hauer K, Teherani A, Kerr K, O’Sullivan P, Irby D. Student Performance Problems in Medical School Clinical Skills Assessments. Acad Med 2007;82:S69-S72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hicks PJ, Cox SM, Espey EL, Goepfert AR, Bienstock JL, Erickson SS, et al. To the point: medical education reviews-dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1915-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Croskerry PMDP. The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them. Acad Med 2003;78:775-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Scott I. Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ 2009;339:22-. [CrossRef]
  8. Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:106-13. [PubMed]
  9. Dudek N, Marks M, Regehr G. Failure to fail: The Perspectives of Clinical Supervisors. Acad Med 2005;80:S84-S7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Audétat MC, Faguy A, Jacques A, Blais J, Charlin B. Étude exploratoire des perceptions et pratiques de médecins cliniciens enseignants engagés dans une démarche de diagnostic et de remédiation des lacunes du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:7-16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  11. Stone S, Ellers B, Holmes D, Orgren R, Qualters D, Thompson J. Identifying oneself as a teacher; the perceptions of preceptors. Med Educ 2002;36:180-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vanek E, Snyder C, Hull A, Hekelman F. The relationship between teachers’ confidence and use of clinical teaching skills in ambulatory care settings. Teach Learn Med 1996;8:137-41. [CrossRef]
  13. Bordage G. Why Did I Miss the Diagnosis? Some Cognitive Explanations and Educational implications. Acad Med 1999;74:S138-S43.
  14. Norman G, Eva K. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2010;44:94-100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Graber M, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic Error in Internal medicine. Archives Int Med 2005; 165:1493-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Malterud K. Reflexivity and metapositions; strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence. J Eval Clin Pract 2002;8:121-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kalf A, Spruijt-Metz D. Variation in diagnoses: influence of specialist’s training on selection and ranking relevant information in geriatric case vignettes. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:705-12. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  18. Berner E, Graber M. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med 2008; 121(Suppl):2-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kempainen R, Migeon M, Wolf F. Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2003;25:177-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Windish D, Price E, Clever S, Magaziner J, Thomas P. Teaching Medical Students the Important Connection between Communication and Clinical reasoning. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1108-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Audétat MC, Laurin S. Supervision du raisonnement clinique : Méthodes et outil pour soutenir et stimuler un raisonnement clinique efficace. Le Médecin de famille canadien 2010;56:294-96.
  22. Audétat MC, Laurin S. Clinicien et superviseur, même combat ! Le Médecin du Québec 2010;45:53-7.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.