EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 11 / Numéro 2 (mai 2010) Pédagogie Médicale, 11 2 (2010) 97-109 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 11, Number 2, mai 2010
Page(s) 97 - 109
Section Recherches et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2010011
Published online 13 décembre 2010
  1. Frank JR. (Ed). The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2005 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://crmcc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/. [Google Scholar]
  2. Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes. Profil de la pratique de l’ergothérapie au Canada. Ottawa : CAOT Publications ACE, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tardif J. L’évaluation des compétences: Documenter le parcours de développement. Montréal (QC) : Chenelière Éducation, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Eitel F, Kanz KG, Hortig E, Tesche A. Do we face a fourth paradigm shift in medicine-algorithms in education? J Eval Clin Pract 2000;6:321-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daley BJ, Torre DM. Concept maps in medical education: an analytical literature review. Med Educ 2010;44:440-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ausubel DP. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York : Holt, Reinhart & Winston 1968. [Google Scholar]
  7. Marchand C, Ivernois J-F. Les cartes conceptuelles dans les formations en santé. Pédagogie Médicale 2004;5:230-40. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kinchin I. If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren’t we all doing it? Int J Sci Educ 2001;23:1257-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Novak JD, Gowin DB. Learning How to Learn. New York : Cambridge University Press 1984. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Thomas A. Changing clinicians’ habits: Is this the hidden challenge to increasing best practices? Disabil Rehabil: 2009;31(21):1790-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Torre DM, Daley B, Stark-Schweitzer T, Siddartha S, Petkova J, Ziebert M. A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps. Med Teach 2007;29:949-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hilbert TS, Renkl A. Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? Instr Sci 2008;36:53-73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pudelko B, Basque J. Logiciels de construction de cartes de connaissances : des outils pour apprendre. 2005 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.profetic.org/dossiers/spip.php?rubrique108. [Google Scholar]
  14. Novak JD. The Promise of New Ideas and New Technology for Improving Teaching and Learning. Cell Biology Education 2003;2:122-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.