Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 11, Numéro 1, février 2010
Page(s) 37 - 49
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2010005
Publié en ligne 23 septembre 2010
  1. Larousse. Dictionnaires en ligne. [On-line]. Disponible sur : http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/publication/64958
  2. US National Library of Medicine. Currently indexed journals. 2010 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=journals&Cmd=DetailsSearch& Term=currentlyindexed%5BAll%5D
  3. Thompson DF, Segars LW. Publication rates in U.S. schools and colleges of pharmacy, 1976-1992. Pharmacotherapy 1995;15:487-94. [PubMed]
  4. Coleman CI, Schlesselman LS, Lao E, White CM. Number and impact of published scholarly works by pharmacy practice faculty members at accredited US colleges and schools of pharmacy (2001-2003). Am J Pharm Educ 2007;71:44. [PubMed]
  5. Thompson DF, Callen EC, Nahata MC. Publication metrics and record of pharmacy practice chairs. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:268-75. [PubMed]
  6. Ballentine R, Ballentine L. A survey of interdisciplinary participation in medical and pharmaceutical literature. Hosp Pharm 1979;14:25-7. [PubMed]
  7. Touchette DR, Bearden DT, Ottum SA. Research publication by pharmacist authors in major medical journals: changes over a 10-year interval. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:584-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hall K, Bussières JF, Lefebvre P, Macregor P, Babich M, Harding J, et al. Rapport canadien sur la pharmacie hospitalière 2005-2006. 2007 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.lillyhospitalsurvey.ca/hpc2/content/ReportsF3.asp
  9. Barnett RC, Carr P, Boisnier AD, Ash A, Friedman RH, Moskowitz MA et al. Relationships of gender and career motivation to medical faculty members’ production of academic publications. Acad Med 1998;73:180-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1282-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bland CJ, Center BA, Finstad DA, Risbey KR, Staples JG. A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Acad Med 2005;80:225-37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hueston WJ. Factors associated with research efforts of academic family physicians. J Fam Pract 1993;37:44-8. [PubMed]
  13. Ferrer RL, Katerndahl DA. Predictors of short-term and long-term scholarly activity by academic faculty: a departmental case study. Fam Med 2002;34:455-61. [PubMed]
  14. Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2004;19:811-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(2):MR000005.
  16. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Hampton CL. Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success, recognitioncommitment to academic medicine. Results of a survey. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2625-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, Carr PL, Ash AS, Szalacha L et al. Junior faculty members' mentoring re- lationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1998;73:318-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med 1991;154:423-6. [PubMed]
  19. Dorsey ER, Raphael BA, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL. Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents. Neurology 2006;67:1335-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Itagaki MW, Pile-Spellman J. Factors associated with academic radiology research productivity. Radiology 2005;237:774-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust 2006;184:621-6. [PubMed]
  22. von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998;280:254-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ateshkadi A, Munger MA. Comparison of publication rates for basic sciences versus practice from pharmacy-based grant programs. Pharmacotherapy 1996;16:1128-32. [PubMed]
  25. Peh WC, Ng KH. Why write? Singapore Med J 2008;49:443-4. [PubMed]
  26. Holubar K. Why do we publish? Or, a challenge to the medical profession. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2003;1:156-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weigel RJ, Dracon G, Radhakrishanan R, Rho Y, Sevgen F, Dafoe DC. Inventive systems for academic productivity in a department of surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:300-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Frontera WR, Grimby G, Basford J, Muller D, Ring H. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:161-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(2):MR000016.
  30. Nahata MC. Publishing by pharmacists. DICP 1989;23:809-10. [PubMed]
  31. Bussières JF, Lebel D. Le bonheur de publier. Pharmactuel 2004;37:122-3.
  32. Conseil d’examen du prix des médicaments brevetés. Rapport annuel 2008. [cité le 20090701]; http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/francais/view.asp?x=1211&mid=997. .
  33. Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec. Ordonnances collectives. 2006 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.opq.org/fr/publications/ordonnances_collectives.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.