EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 1 (Février 2018) Pédagogie Médicale, 19 1 (2018) 37-50 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 19, Numéro 1, Février 2018
Page(s) 37 - 50
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2019001
Publié en ligne 26 avril 2019
  1. Morrison J. Selecting for medical education. Med Educ 2016;50:3‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Non-continuation rates: Trends and profiles. 2016 [On-line] Disponible sur https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160106192551/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/analysis/ncr/nc/. [Google Scholar]
  3. Association of American Medical Colleges. US Medical School Applicants and Matriculants by school, state of legal residence and sex 2014. AAMC 2014 [On-line] Disponible sur https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boelen C. Global consensus on social accountability of medical schools. Santé Publique 2011;23:247‐50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ 2016;50:36‐60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fayolle A-V, Passirani C, Letertre E, Ramond A, Perrotin D, Saint-André J-P, Richard I. Sélection des étudiants en médicine : facteurs prédictifs de réussite ; une revue systématique de la littérature. Presse Med 2016;45:483‐94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright SR, Bradley PM. Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection? Med Educ 2010;44(11):1069‐76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hemmerdinger JM, Stoddart SD, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Newton PE, Shaw SD. Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;6:297‐335. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cureton EE. Validity, in Educational measurement, Lindquist EF, Editor. American Council on Education: Washington DC, 1951, p. 621‐94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955;52(4):281‐302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cronbach LJ. Test validation, in Educational measurement (2nd ed.), Thorndike RL, Editor. American Council on Education: Washington DC, 1971, p. 443‐507. [Google Scholar]
  14. Messick S. Validity, in Educational measurement (3rd ed.), Linn RL, Editor. American Council on Education and Macmillan: New York (NY), 1989, p. 13‐104. [Google Scholar]
  15. AERA, APA, NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: AERA, APA, & NCME, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kane, MT. Validation, in Educational measurement (4th ed.), Brennan RL, Editor. American Council on Education and Praeger: Westport, CT, 2006, p. 17‐64. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kane MT. Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity. Journal of Educational Measurement 2013;50:115‐22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pennaforte T, Loye N. Une approche pragmatique de validation en éducation médicale : l’application du modèle de Kane à un outil d’évaluation du raisonnement clinique, in Mesure et évaluation des compétences en éducation médicale : regards actuels et prospectifs, Dionne E, Raiche I, Editors. Presses de l’Université du Québec : Québec, 2017, p. 143‐176. [Google Scholar]
  19. Loye N. Et si la validation était plus qu’une suite de procédures techniques ? Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation 2018;41:97‐123. [Google Scholar]
  20. Benbassat J, Baumal R. Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2017;12:509‐21. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002;324:952‐7. [Google Scholar]
  22. McManus IC, Ferguson E, Wakeford R, Powis D, James D. Predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test: An evaluation and case study. Med Teach 2011;33:53‐7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Esmail A, Nelson P, Primarolo D, Torna T. Acceptance into medical school and racial discrimination. BMJ 1995;310:501‐2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stegers-Jager KM, Steyerberg EW, Lucieer SM, Themmen APN. Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria. Med Educ 2015;49:124‐133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Simmenroth-Nayda A, Görlich Y. Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors? BMC Med Educ 2015;15:81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Girotti JA, Park YS, Tekian A. Ensuring a fair and equitable selection of students to serve society’s health care needs. Med Educ 2015;49:84‐92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lievens F, Patterson F, Corstjens J, Martin S, Nicholson S. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT. Med Educ 2016;50:624‐36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cohen-Schotanus J, Muijtjens AMM, Reinders JJ, Agsteribbe J, van Rossum HJM, van der Vleuten CPM. The predictive validity of grade point average scores in a partial lottery medical school admission system. Med Educ 2006;40:1012‐19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McManus I, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS, Woolf K, Potts HW et al. Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: Meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies. BMC Medecine 2013;11:243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Emery JL, Bell JF. The predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test for pre-clinical examination performance. Med Educ 2009;43:557‐64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferguson E, James D, O’Hehir F, Sanders A, McManus IC. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ 2003;326:429‐32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 2003;78:313‐21. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kreiter CD, Yin P, Solow C, Brennan RL. Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:147‐59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siu E, Reiter HI. Overview: What’s worked and what hasn’t as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:759‐75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Norman G. The morality of Medical School Admissions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:79‐82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lievens F, Coetsier P, De Fruyt F, De Maeseneer J. Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Med Educ 2002;36:1050‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:1514‐35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach 2013;35:e1267‐e1301. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schripsema NR, van Trigt AM, van der Wal MA, Cohen-Schotanus J. How different medical school selection processes call upon different personality characteristics. PloS One 2016;11:e0150645. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Le H, Oh I-S, Robbins SB, Ilies R, Holland E, Westrick P. Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. J Appl Psychol 2011;96:113‐33. [Google Scholar]
  41. Griffin B, Wilson IG. Faking good: Self-enhancement in medical school applicants. Med Educ 2012;46:485‐90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Motowidlo SJ, Dunnette MD, Carter GW. An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. J Appl Psychol 1990;75:640‐47. [Google Scholar]
  43. Patterson F, Ashworth V, Kerrin M, O’Neill P. Situational judgement tests represent a measurement method and can be designed to minimise coaching effects. Med Educ 2013;47:220‐1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lievens F. Adjusting medical school admission: Assessing interpersonal skills using situational judgement tests. Med Educ 2013;47182‐9. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmitt N, Keeney J, Oswald FL, Pleskac TJ, Billington AQ, Sinha R et al. Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:1479‐97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McDaniel MA, Hartman NS, Whetzel DL, Grubb WL. Situational judgement tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 2007;60:63‐91. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sharma N, Nagle YK. Development of pictorial situational judgement test of affect. Psychology development of pictorial situational judgement test of affect. Psychology 2015;6:400‐408. [Google Scholar]
  48. Liao S-C, Hsiue T-R, Lin C-H, Huang A-M. Multiple mini-interviews combined with group interviews in medical student selection. Med Educ 2014;48:1104 [Google Scholar]
  49. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 2009;43:767‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Harris S, Owen C. Discerning quality: Using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 2007;41:234‐41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Oluwasanjo A, Wasser T, Alweis R. Correlation between MMI performance and OSCE performance – a pilot study. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2015;5:27808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bergeron L, Saint-Onge C, Martel S, Hanna D. Évaluation édumétrique d’un dispositif d’entrevues structurées multiples pour la sélection de candidats dans un programme postgradué de dermatologie. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:17‐27. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Knorr M, Hissbach J. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ 2014;48:1157‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Uijtdehaage S, Doyle L, Parker N. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Acad Med 2011;86:1032‐9. [Google Scholar]
  56. Roberts C, Clark T, Burgess A, Frommer M, Grant M, Mossman K. The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wright SR, Bradley PM. Has the UK clinical aptitude test improved medical student selection? Med Educ 2010;44:1069‐76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yates J, James D. The UK clinical aptitude test and clinical course performance at Nottingham: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2013;13(1):32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lynch B, Mackenzie R, Dowell J, Cleland J, Prescott G. Does the UKCAT predict Year 1 performance in medical school? Med Educ 2009;43:1203‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. McManus IC, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS, McManus I, Richards P, Reiter H. The UKCAT-12 study: Educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools. BMC Med 2013;11:244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Husbands A, Mathieson A, Dowell J, Cleland J, MacKenzie R, McManus I, Norman G. Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks (CA) and New Delhi: Sage, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  63. Morrison J. Selecting for medical education. Med Educ 2016;50:3‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Allen J, Robbins SB, Sawyer R. Can measuring psychosocial factors promote college success? Appl Meas Educ 2009;23:1‐22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. De Clercq M, Galand B, Frenay M. Transition from high school to university: A person-centered approach to academic achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ 2017;32:39‐59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.