EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 1 (Février 2018) Pédagogie Médicale, 19 1 (2018) 37-50 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 19, Number 1, Février 2018
Page(s) 37 - 50
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2019001
Published online 26 avril 2019
  1. Morrison J. Selecting for medical education. Med Educ 2016;50:3‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Non-continuation rates: Trends and profiles. 2016 [On-line] Disponible sur https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160106192551/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/analysis/ncr/nc/. [Google Scholar]
  3. Association of American Medical Colleges. US Medical School Applicants and Matriculants by school, state of legal residence and sex 2014. AAMC 2014 [On-line] Disponible sur https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boelen C. Global consensus on social accountability of medical schools. Santé Publique 2011;23:247‐50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ 2016;50:36‐60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fayolle A-V, Passirani C, Letertre E, Ramond A, Perrotin D, Saint-André J-P, Richard I. Sélection des étudiants en médicine : facteurs prédictifs de réussite ; une revue systématique de la littérature. Presse Med 2016;45:483‐94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright SR, Bradley PM. Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection? Med Educ 2010;44(11):1069‐76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hemmerdinger JM, Stoddart SD, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Newton PE, Shaw SD. Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;6:297‐335. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cureton EE. Validity, in Educational measurement, Lindquist EF, Editor. American Council on Education: Washington DC, 1951, p. 621‐94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955;52(4):281‐302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cronbach LJ. Test validation, in Educational measurement (2nd ed.), Thorndike RL, Editor. American Council on Education: Washington DC, 1971, p. 443‐507. [Google Scholar]
  14. Messick S. Validity, in Educational measurement (3rd ed.), Linn RL, Editor. American Council on Education and Macmillan: New York (NY), 1989, p. 13‐104. [Google Scholar]
  15. AERA, APA, NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: AERA, APA, & NCME, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kane, MT. Validation, in Educational measurement (4th ed.), Brennan RL, Editor. American Council on Education and Praeger: Westport, CT, 2006, p. 17‐64. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kane MT. Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity. Journal of Educational Measurement 2013;50:115‐22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pennaforte T, Loye N. Une approche pragmatique de validation en éducation médicale : l’application du modèle de Kane à un outil d’évaluation du raisonnement clinique, in Mesure et évaluation des compétences en éducation médicale : regards actuels et prospectifs, Dionne E, Raiche I, Editors. Presses de l’Université du Québec : Québec, 2017, p. 143‐176. [Google Scholar]
  19. Loye N. Et si la validation était plus qu’une suite de procédures techniques ? Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation 2018;41:97‐123. [Google Scholar]
  20. Benbassat J, Baumal R. Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2017;12:509‐21. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002;324:952‐7. [Google Scholar]
  22. McManus IC, Ferguson E, Wakeford R, Powis D, James D. Predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test: An evaluation and case study. Med Teach 2011;33:53‐7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Esmail A, Nelson P, Primarolo D, Torna T. Acceptance into medical school and racial discrimination. BMJ 1995;310:501‐2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stegers-Jager KM, Steyerberg EW, Lucieer SM, Themmen APN. Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria. Med Educ 2015;49:124‐133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Simmenroth-Nayda A, Görlich Y. Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors? BMC Med Educ 2015;15:81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Girotti JA, Park YS, Tekian A. Ensuring a fair and equitable selection of students to serve society’s health care needs. Med Educ 2015;49:84‐92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lievens F, Patterson F, Corstjens J, Martin S, Nicholson S. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT. Med Educ 2016;50:624‐36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cohen-Schotanus J, Muijtjens AMM, Reinders JJ, Agsteribbe J, van Rossum HJM, van der Vleuten CPM. The predictive validity of grade point average scores in a partial lottery medical school admission system. Med Educ 2006;40:1012‐19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McManus I, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS, Woolf K, Potts HW et al. Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: Meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies. BMC Medecine 2013;11:243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Emery JL, Bell JF. The predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test for pre-clinical examination performance. Med Educ 2009;43:557‐64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferguson E, James D, O’Hehir F, Sanders A, McManus IC. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ 2003;326:429‐32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 2003;78:313‐21. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kreiter CD, Yin P, Solow C, Brennan RL. Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:147‐59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siu E, Reiter HI. Overview: What’s worked and what hasn’t as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:759‐75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Norman G. The morality of Medical School Admissions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:79‐82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lievens F, Coetsier P, De Fruyt F, De Maeseneer J. Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Med Educ 2002;36:1050‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:1514‐35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach 2013;35:e1267‐e1301. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schripsema NR, van Trigt AM, van der Wal MA, Cohen-Schotanus J. How different medical school selection processes call upon different personality characteristics. PloS One 2016;11:e0150645. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Le H, Oh I-S, Robbins SB, Ilies R, Holland E, Westrick P. Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. J Appl Psychol 2011;96:113‐33. [Google Scholar]
  41. Griffin B, Wilson IG. Faking good: Self-enhancement in medical school applicants. Med Educ 2012;46:485‐90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Motowidlo SJ, Dunnette MD, Carter GW. An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. J Appl Psychol 1990;75:640‐47. [Google Scholar]
  43. Patterson F, Ashworth V, Kerrin M, O’Neill P. Situational judgement tests represent a measurement method and can be designed to minimise coaching effects. Med Educ 2013;47:220‐1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lievens F. Adjusting medical school admission: Assessing interpersonal skills using situational judgement tests. Med Educ 2013;47182‐9. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmitt N, Keeney J, Oswald FL, Pleskac TJ, Billington AQ, Sinha R et al. Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:1479‐97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McDaniel MA, Hartman NS, Whetzel DL, Grubb WL. Situational judgement tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 2007;60:63‐91. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sharma N, Nagle YK. Development of pictorial situational judgement test of affect. Psychology development of pictorial situational judgement test of affect. Psychology 2015;6:400‐408. [Google Scholar]
  48. Liao S-C, Hsiue T-R, Lin C-H, Huang A-M. Multiple mini-interviews combined with group interviews in medical student selection. Med Educ 2014;48:1104 [Google Scholar]
  49. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 2009;43:767‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378‐84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Harris S, Owen C. Discerning quality: Using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 2007;41:234‐41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Oluwasanjo A, Wasser T, Alweis R. Correlation between MMI performance and OSCE performance – a pilot study. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2015;5:27808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bergeron L, Saint-Onge C, Martel S, Hanna D. Évaluation édumétrique d’un dispositif d’entrevues structurées multiples pour la sélection de candidats dans un programme postgradué de dermatologie. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:17‐27. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Knorr M, Hissbach J. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ 2014;48:1157‐75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Uijtdehaage S, Doyle L, Parker N. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Acad Med 2011;86:1032‐9. [Google Scholar]
  56. Roberts C, Clark T, Burgess A, Frommer M, Grant M, Mossman K. The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wright SR, Bradley PM. Has the UK clinical aptitude test improved medical student selection? Med Educ 2010;44:1069‐76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yates J, James D. The UK clinical aptitude test and clinical course performance at Nottingham: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2013;13(1):32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lynch B, Mackenzie R, Dowell J, Cleland J, Prescott G. Does the UKCAT predict Year 1 performance in medical school? Med Educ 2009;43:1203‐9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. McManus IC, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS, McManus I, Richards P, Reiter H. The UKCAT-12 study: Educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools. BMC Med 2013;11:244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Husbands A, Mathieson A, Dowell J, Cleland J, MacKenzie R, McManus I, Norman G. Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks (CA) and New Delhi: Sage, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  63. Morrison J. Selecting for medical education. Med Educ 2016;50:3‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Allen J, Robbins SB, Sawyer R. Can measuring psychosocial factors promote college success? Appl Meas Educ 2009;23:1‐22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. De Clercq M, Galand B, Frenay M. Transition from high school to university: A person-centered approach to academic achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ 2017;32:39‐59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.