Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 17, Numéro 1, Février 2016
Page(s) 65 - 75
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2016024
Publié en ligne 12 août 2016
  1. Nendaz M, Charlin B, Leblanc V, Bordage G. Le raisonnement clinique: données issues de la recherche et implications pour l’enseignement. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:235-54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, Crevier F, Audétat M-C, Charbonneau A, et al. Clinical reasoning processes: unravelling complexity through graphical representation. Med Educ 2012;46:454-63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 2000;75:182-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41: 1178-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007;41:1133-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med 1994;69:883-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  8. Page G, Bordage G. The Medical Council of Canada’s key features project: a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:104-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Page G, Bordage G, Allen T. Developing key-feature problems and examinations to assess clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:194-201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowles LT. A worthy search: the development of the key-features concept. Acad Med. 1995;70:88-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bordage G, Brailovsky C, Carretier H, Page G. Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:276-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charlin B, Bordage G, Van Der Vleuten C. L’évaluation du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale. 2003;4:42-52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ratté F, Thériault JF. Démarche clinique : raisonnement clinique, examen physique, entrevue médicale. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357:945-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Raupach T, Brown J, Anders S, Hasenfuss G, Harendza S. Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats. BMC Medicine 2013;11: 1-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med 1999;74: 1129-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 2217-25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity and its threats. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsk R, editors. Assessment in health professions education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009:21-55. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nunnally J, Bernstein L. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmeiser CB, Welch CJ. Test development. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport (CT): Praeger Publishers, 2006:307-53. [Google Scholar]
  22. Laveault D, Grégoire J. Introduction aux théories des tests en psychologie et en sciences de l’éducation. 3e ed. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol. 1904;15: 72-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crocker LM, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Manson (OH): Cengage Learning, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:S63-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res 1993;3:430-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.