EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 17 / Numéro 1 (Février 2016) Pédagogie Médicale, 17 1 (2016) 65-75 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 17, Number 1, Février 2016
Page(s) 65 - 75
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2016024
Published online 12 août 2016
  1. Nendaz M, Charlin B, Leblanc V, Bordage G. Le raisonnement clinique: données issues de la recherche et implications pour l’enseignement. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:235-54. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, Crevier F, Audétat M-C, Charbonneau A, et al. Clinical reasoning processes: unravelling complexity through graphical representation. Med Educ 2012;46:454-63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 2000;75:182-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41: 1178-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007;41:1133-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med 1994;69:883-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  8. Page G, Bordage G. The Medical Council of Canada’s key features project: a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:104-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Page G, Bordage G, Allen T. Developing key-feature problems and examinations to assess clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:194-201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowles LT. A worthy search: the development of the key-features concept. Acad Med. 1995;70:88-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bordage G, Brailovsky C, Carretier H, Page G. Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995;70:276-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charlin B, Bordage G, Van Der Vleuten C. L’évaluation du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale. 2003;4:42-52. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ratté F, Thériault JF. Démarche clinique : raisonnement clinique, examen physique, entrevue médicale. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357:945-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Raupach T, Brown J, Anders S, Hasenfuss G, Harendza S. Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats. BMC Medicine 2013;11: 1-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med 1999;74: 1129-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 2217-25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity and its threats. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsk R, editors. Assessment in health professions education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009:21-55. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nunnally J, Bernstein L. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmeiser CB, Welch CJ. Test development. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport (CT): Praeger Publishers, 2006:307-53. [Google Scholar]
  22. Laveault D, Grégoire J. Introduction aux théories des tests en psychologie et en sciences de l’éducation. 3e ed. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol. 1904;15: 72-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crocker LM, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Manson (OH): Cengage Learning, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:S63-7. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res 1993;3:430-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.