Accès gratuit
Numéro |
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 16, Numéro 1, Février 2015
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 49 - 64 | |
Section | Recherche et perspectives | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2015012 | |
Publié en ligne | 13 août 2015 |
- Goudreau J, Boyer L, Létourneau D. Clinical nursing reasoning in nursing practice: A cognitive learning model based on a think aloud methodology. Quality Advanced in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière 2014;1:4 [Google Scholar]
- Frenk JCL,Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crips N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010;376:1923-58 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindeman CA. The future of nursing education. J Nurs Educ 2000;39:5-12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fero LJ, Witsberger CM, Wesmiller SW, Zullo TG, Hoffman LA. Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experiences nurses. J Adv Nurs 2009;65: 139-48 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durak HI, Caliskan SA, Bor S, van der Vleuten C. Use of case-based exams as an instructional teaching tool to teach clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2007;29: e170-74 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gierl MJ. Making diagnostic inferences about cognitive attributes using the rulespace model and attribute hierarchy method. J Educ Meas 2007;44:325-40 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kalamideres M, Caire F, Dauger F, Brassier G, Moreau JJ. Création d’outils d’autoévaluation pour une formation médicale continue en ligne : Modélisation à propos d’une formation. Neurochirurgie 2008;54:21-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boychuk Duchscher JE. Critical thinking: Perceptions of newly graduated female baccalaureate nurses. J Nurs Educ 2003;42:14-27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlin B, Borgage G, van der Vleuten C. L’évaluation du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2003;4:42-52 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Charlin B, Gagnon R, Sibert L, van der Vleuten C. Le test de concordance de script : Un instrument d’évaluation du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2002;3:135-44 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Carrière B, Gagnon R, Charlin R, Downing S, Bordage G. Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: Validity evidence for a script concordance test. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53: 647-52 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlin B, van der Vleuten C. Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: The script concordance approach. Eval Health Prof 2004;27:304-19 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deschênes MF. Élaboration et évaluation des propriétés psychométriques d’un instrument d’évaluation du raisonnement clinique empreint de human caring (mémoire). Montréal : Université de Montréal, 2006 [Google Scholar]
- Deschênes MF, Charlin B, Gagnon R, Goudreau J. Use of a script concordance test to assess development of clinical reasoning in nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2011;50:381-87 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Côté S, Tanguay A, Gagnon R, Charlin B, Michaud C. Élaboration et validation d’un test de concordance de script pour évaluer le raisonnement clinique des infirmières en contexte de détérioration clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2014;15:7-20 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Latreille M-E. Évaluation du raisonnement clinique d’étudiantes et d’infirmières dans le domaine de la pédiatrie, à l’aide d’un test de concordance de script. Ottawa : Université d’Ottawa, 2012 [Google Scholar]
- Audétat MC, Laurin S. Supervision of clinical reasoning: Methods and a tool to support and promote clinical reasoning. Can Fam Physician 2010;56: e127-129 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elstein AS, Swchartz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: Selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ 2002;324:729-32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kautz DD, Kuiper R, Pesut DJ, Knight-Brown P, Daneker D. Promoting clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: Application and evaluation of the outcome present state test (opt) model of clinical reasoning. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2005;2: 4-19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Funkesson KH, Anbäcken EM, Ek AC. Nurses’ reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study. Int J Nurs Stud 2007;44:1109-19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Simmons B. Clinical reasoning: Concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:1151-58 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonteyn M. Thinking strategies for nursing practice. Philadelphie (PA); 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Higgs J, Jones M, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Amsterdam: Butterworth Heinemann; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Caire F, Sol JC, Moreau JJ, Isidori P, Charlin B. Auto-évaluation des internes en neurochirurgie par tests de concordance de script (tcs) : Le processus d’élaboration des tests. Neurochirurgie 2004;50:66-72 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagnon R, Charlin B, Lambert C, Carrière B, van der Vleuten C. Script concordance testing: More cases or more questions? Adv Health Scien Educ 2009;14: 367-75 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz JG, Tunuguntla R, Charlin B, Ouslander JG, Symes SN, Gagnon R, et al. The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning skills in geriatric urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:2178-84 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marie I, Sibert L, Roussel F, Hellot MF, Lechevallier J, Weber J. Le test de concordance de scripts : Un nouvel outil d’évaluation du raisonnement et de la compétence clinique en médecine interne ? Rev Med Interne 2005;26:501-7 [Google Scholar]
- Meterissian S, Zalobotny B, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Is the script concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intraoperative decision-making skills? Am J Surg 2007;193:248-51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lubarsky S, Chalk C, Kazitani D, Gagnon R, Charlin B. The script concordance test: A new tool assessing clinical judgement in neurology. Can J Neurol Sci 2009;36:326-31 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlin B, Gagnon R, Lubarsky S, Lambert C, Meterissian S, Chalk C, et al. Assessment in the context of uncertainty using the script concordance test: More meaning for scores. Teach Learn Med 2010;22:180-6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park AJ, Barber M, Bent AE, Dooley YT, Dancz C, Sutkin G, et al. Assessment of intraoperative judgment during gynecologic surgery using the script concordance test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203: e1-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sibert L, Charlin B, Gagnon R, Corcos J, Khalaf A, Grise P. Evaluation of clinical reasoning in urology: Contribution of the script concordance test. Prog Urol 2001;11:1213-19 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loye N. Quelques nouveaux modèles de mesure. Mesure et Évaluation 2005;28:51-68 [Google Scholar]
- Tatsuoka KK. Rule-space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. J Educ Meas 1983;20:345-354 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res 1993;3:430-41 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Humbert AJ, Besinger B, Miech EJ. Assessing clinical reasoning skills in scenarios of uncertainty: Convergent validity for a script concordance test in an emergency medicine clerkship and residency. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:627-34 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith CS. A developmental approach to evaluating competence in clinical reasoning. J Vet Med Educ 2008;35:375-81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucchiari C, Pravettoni G. Cognitive balanced model: A conceptual scheme of diagnostic decision making. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:82-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005;39:418-27 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nouh T, Boutros M, Gagnon R, Reid S, Leslie K, Pace D, et al. The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: A national validation study. Am J Surg 2012;203:530-4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gierl MJ. Making diagnostic inferences about cognitive attributes using the rule-space model and attribute hierarchy method. J Educ Meas 2007;44: 325-40 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Loye N. Conditions d’élaboration de la matrice Q des modèles cognitifs et impact sur sa validité et sa fidélité. Thèse de doctorat non-publiée, Otttawa : Université d’Ottawa, 2008 [Google Scholar]
- Loye N, Caron F, Pineault J, Tessier-Baillargeon M, Burney-Vincent C, et Gagnon M. La validité du diagnostic issu d’un marriage entre didactique et mesure sur un test existant. Dans Raîche G P-CK, Magis D (Dir.), ed. La validité du diagnostic issu d’un marriage entre didactique et mesure sur un test existant. Ste-Foy, Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2011:11-30. [Google Scholar]
- Audétat MC, Dory V, Nendaz M, Vanpee D, Pestiaux D, Junod Perron N, et al. What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties? Med Educ 2012;46:216-27 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.