EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 22 / Numéro 3 (2021) Pédagogie Médicale, 22 3 (2021) 147-155 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 22, Numéro 3, 2021
Page(s) 147 - 155
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2021011
Publié en ligne 11 novembre 2021
  1. Lavigne B, Fontaine A. La réforme du troisième cycle des études médicales : où en est-on ? Inf Psychiatr 2018;94:851‐6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Décret n°2016-1597 du 25 novembre 2016 relatif à l’organisation du troisième cycle des études de médecine et modifiant le code de l’éducation. Journal officiel de la République Française, 2016 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000033479390/. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrêté du 21 avril 2017 relatif aux connaissances, aux compétences et aux maquettes de formation des diplômes d’études spécialisées et fixant la liste de ces diplômes et des options et formations spécialisées transversales du troisième cycle des études de médecine. Journal officiel de la République Française, 2017 [On-line]. Disponible sur : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000034502881/. [Google Scholar]
  4. Van Effenterre A, Hanon C, Llorca P-M. Enquête auprès des PU-PH sur la formation en psychiatrie en France. L’Encéphale 2014;40:208‐15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nordgaard J, Sass LA, Parnas J. The psychiatric interview: validity, structure, and subjectivity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2013;263:353‐64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dreimüller N, Schenkel S, Stoll M, Koch C, Lieb K, Juenger J. Development of a checklist for evaluating psychiatric reports. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl 20):22‐33;quiz 34-57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coyle TN, Shaver JA, Linehan MM. On the potential for iatrogenic effects of psychiatric crisis services: The example of dialectical behavior therapy for adult women with borderline personality disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2018;86:116‐24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York: Guilford Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindson-Hawley N, Thompson TP, Begh R. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;(3):Art. No.: CD006936. [On-line] Disponible sur : https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub3/abstract. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundahl B, Burke BL. The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. J Clin Psychol 2009;65:1232‐45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Salvo MC, Cannon-Breland ML. Motivational interviewing for medication adherence. J Am Pharm Assoc 2015;55:e354‐361;quiz e362-363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Abele M, Brown J, Ibrahim H, Jha MK. Teaching motivational interviewing skills to psychiatry trainees: findings of a national survey. Acad Psychiatry 2016;40:149‐52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roman B, Borges N, Morrison AK. Teaching motivational interviewing skills to third-year psychiatry clerkship students. Acad Psychiatry 2011;35:51‐3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaplan S, Elliott H. Using motivational interviewing to meet core competencies in psychiatric resident training. Acad Psychiatry 2011;35:46‐50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Renner JA. How to train residents to identify and treat dual diagnosis patients. Biol Psychiatry 2004;56:810‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown RL, Oriel K. Teaching motivational interviewing to first-year students. Acad Med 1998;73:589‐90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chéret A, Durier C, Noël N, Bourdic K, Legrand C, D’Andréa C, et al. Motivational interviewing training for medical students: A pilot pre-post feasibility study. Patient Educ Couns 2018;101:1934‐41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK, Hendrickson SML, Miller WR. Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005;28:19‐26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moyers TB, Rowell LN, Manuel JK, Ernst D, Houck JM. The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI 4): Rationale, preliminary reliability and validity. J Subst Abuse Treat 2016;65:36‐42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martino S, Haeseler F, Belitsky R, Pantalon M, Fortin AH. Teaching brief motivational interviewing to year three medical students. Med Educ 2007;41:160‐7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller WR, Hedrick KE, Orlofsky DR. The Helpful Responses Questionnaire: a procedure for measuring therapeutic empathy. J Clin Psychol 1991;47:444‐8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. White LL, Gazewood JD, Mounsey AL. Teaching students behavior change skills: description and assessment of a new Motivational interviewing curriculum. Med Teach 2007;29:e67‐71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poirier MK, Clark MM, Cerhan JH, Pruthi S, Geda YE, Dale LC. Teaching Motivational Interviewing to First-Year Medical Students to Improve Counseling Skills in Health Behavior Change. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:327‐31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Edwards EJ, Bannatyne AJ, Stark AC. Twelve tips for teaching brief motivational interviewing to medical students. Med Teach 2018;40:231‐6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav 2017;31:862‐87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Halloran PD, Blackstock F, Shields N, Holland A, Iles R, Kingsley M, et al. Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in people with chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2014;28:1159‐71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mounsey AL, Bovbjerg V, White L, Gazewood J. Do students develop better motivational interviewing skills through role-play with standardised patients or with student colleagues? Med Educ 2006;40:775‐80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rasasingam D, Kerry G, Gokani S, Zargaran A, Ash J, Mittal A. Being a patient: a medical student’s perspective. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;8:163‐5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Girard G, Clavet D, Boulé R. Planifier et animer un jeu de rôle profitable pour l’apprentissage. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:178‐85. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:361‐72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Turner SR, White J, Poth C. Twelve tips for developing a near-peer shadowing program to prepare students for clinical training. Med Teach 2012;34:792‐5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kirkpatrick DL. Techniques for evaluating training programmes. Train Dev J 1979;33(6):78‐92. [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris IB. Qualitative methods. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DH, Dolmans JM (Eds.), International handbook of research in medical education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2002:45‐95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Parent F, Jouquan J. Comment élaborer et analyser un référentiel de compétences en santé ? Une clarification conceptuelle et méthodologique de l’approche par compétences. Louvain-la-Neuve : De Boeck Superieur, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for evaluation. In: Stufflebeam DL, Kellaghan T (Eds.). The international handbook of educational evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.