EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 23 / Numéro 2 (2022) Pédagogie Médicale, 23 2 (2022) 135-140 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 23, Numéro 2, 2022
Page(s) 135 - 140
Section Concepts et Innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2022009
Publié en ligne 2 août 2022
  1. Haute autorité de santé (collectif). Guide de bonnes pratiques en matière de simulation en santé. Saint-Denis La Plaine: Haute autorité de santé, 2012 [On-line] Disponible sur: https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-01/guide_bonnes_pratiques_simulation_sante_guide.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lioce L, Lopreiato J, Dowing D, Chang T.P, Robertson J.M, Anderson M et al. Healthcare simulation dictionary (2nd ed.). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang R, DeMaria S, Goldberg A, Katz D. A systematic review of serious games in training health care professionals. Simul Healthc 2016;11:41–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L’Estrade Ehrstrom B, Wortley, D, Lilienthal A, Car L et al. Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12994. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br J Surg 2012;99:1322–1330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drummond D, Hadchouel A, Tesniere A. Serious games for health: three steps forwards. Adv Simul (Lond) 2017;2:3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crookall D. Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation & Gaming 2010;41:898–920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013;35:e867–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morris BJ, Croker S, Zimmerman C, Gill D, Romig C. Gaming science: the “Gamification” of scientific thinking. Front Psychol 2013;4:607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sardi L, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman JL A. systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform 2017;71:31–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dankbaar ME, Richters O, Kalkman CJ, Prins G, ten Cate OTJ, van Merrienboeret JJG et al. Comparative effectiveness of a serious game and an e-module to support patient safety knowledge and awareness. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dankbaar ME, Alsma J, Jansen EE, van Merrienboer JJ, van Saase JL, Schuit SC. An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students’ clinical cognitive skills and motivation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2016;21:505–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dankbaar M. Serious games and blended learning; effects on performance and motivation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ 2017;6:58–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaczmarczyk J, Davidson R, Bryden D, Haselden S, Vivekananda-Schmidt P. Learning decision making through serious games. Clin Teach 2016;13:277–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Blanie A, Amorim MA, Benhamou D. Comparative value of a simulation by gaming and a traditional teaching method to improve clinical reasoning skills necessary to detect patient deterioration: a randomized study in nursing students. BMC Med Educ 2020;20: 53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maheu-Cadotte MA, Cossette S, Dube V, Fontaine G, Lavallée A, Lavoie P et al. Efficacy of serious games in healthcare professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 2021;16:199–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2005;4:193–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010;85:1589–1602. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, Stathakarou N, Davies D, Saxena N, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res 2019;21: e14676. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorbanev I, Agudelo-Londono S, Gonzalez RA, Cortes A, Pomares A, Delgadillo V et al. A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy. Med Educ Online 2018;23:1438718. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sipiyaruk K, Gallagher J.E, Hatzipanagos S, Reynolds PA. A rapid review of serious games: From healthcare education to dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2018;22:243–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Drummond D, Delval P, Abdenouri S, Truchot J, Ceccaldi P-F, Plaisance P et al. Serious game versus online course for pretraining medical students before a simulation-based mastery learning course on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017;34:836–844. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kleinert R, Heiermann N, Plum P.S, Wahba R, Chang D.H, Maus M et al. Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education. J Med Internet Res 2015;17: e263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Raupach T, de Temple I, Middeke A, Anders S, Morton C, Schuelper N. Effectiveness of a serious game addressing guideline adherence: cohort study with 1.5-year follow-up. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mohan D, Farris C, Fischhoff B, Rosengart MR, Angus DC, Yealy DM et al. Efficacy of educational video game versus traditional educational apps at improving physician decision making in trauma triage: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2017;359:j5416. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knight JF, Carley S, Tregunna B, Jarvis S, Smithies R, de Freitas S et al. Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial. Resuscitation 2010;81:1175–1179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liaw SY, Chng DYJ, Wong LF, Ho JTY, Mordiffi SZ, Cooper S et al. The impact of a Web-based educational program on the recognition and management of deteriorating patients. J Clin Nurs 2017;26:4848–4856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. LeFlore JL, Anderson M, Zielke MA, Nelson KA, Thomas P.E, Hardee G et al. Can a virtual patient trainer teach student nurses how to save lives--teaching nursing students about pediatric respiratory diseases. Simul Healthc 2012;7:10–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mohan D, Angus DC, Ricketts D, Ricketts D, Farris C, Fischhoff B et al. Assessing the validity of using serious game technology to analyze physician decision making. PLoS One 2014;9:e105445. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schubach F, Goos M, Fabry G, Vach W, Boeker M. Virtual patients in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills: does presentation mode matter? A quasi-randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chung C, Cooper SJ, Cant R.P, Connell C, McKay A, Kinsman L et al. The educational impact of web-based and face-to-face patient deterioration simulation programs: An interventional trial. Nurse Educ Today 2018;64:93–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Foronda CL, Fernandez-Burgos M, Nadeau C, Kelley CN, Henry MN. Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018. Simul Healthc 2020;15:46–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.