EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 13 / Numéro 4 (novembre 2012) Pédagogie Médicale, 13 4 (2012) 273-283 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 13, Number 4, novembre 2012
Page(s) 273 - 283
Section Concepts et innovations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2012023
Published online 3 janvier 2013
  1. Bras LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs. Acad Med 2010;85:692-701. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, M, el Guebaly N. Research productivity among PhD faculty members and affiliates responding to the Canadian Association of Professors of Psychiatry and Canadian Psychiatric Association survey. Can J Psychiatry 1996;41:509-12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark JM, Hanel DP. The contribution of MD-PhD training to academic orthopaedic faculties. Orthop Res 2001;19:505-10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Prystowsky JH. Factors influencing the pursuit of careers in academic medicine: a survey of MD-PhD residents in dermatology programs in the United States. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:125-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon C, Salmon M. Postgraduate degrees for rheumatology trainees: an options appraisal of MD, PhD and MSc degrees. On behalf of the BSR Research and Training Committee. Rheumatology 1999;38:1290-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickler HB, Di F, Heinig SJ, Johnson E, Korn D. New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the “endangered species”. JAMA 2007; 297:2496-501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Whitcomb ME. The need to restructure MD-PhD training. Acad Med 2007;82:623-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nabel, GJ. The MD-PhD physician scientist – endangered species or the next generation? Mol Med 1995; 1:369-70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Straus SE, Straus C, Tzanetos K. International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine. Carrer choice in academic medicine: systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:1222-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Association of Professors of Medicine – Physician-Scientist Initiative, Recommendations for Revitalizing the Nation's Physician-Scientist Workforce 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuehnle K, Winkler DT, Meier-Abt PJ. Swiss national MD-PhD program: an outcome analysis. Swiss Med Wkly 2009;139:540-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox TM, Wakeford R. The MB PhD programme. Training to be a clinician-scientisit in the UK. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1993;27:147-50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stevens RJ. Revitalizing the training of clinical scientists in surgery: a U.K. perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1731-1733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forde A. An Overview of German MD/PhD Programs. Science Careers Magazine 2003; October 10. 2003 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://sciencecareers. sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2003_10_10/noDOI.9515322606091922211 [Google Scholar]
  15. Austin J, Ulane R,. The MD/PhD Carrer Track. Science Careers. October 3, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  16. Revillard, JP, Czyba, JC. La Biologie Humaine – Analyse critique et perspectives, Nouv Presse Med 1979; 8: 3275-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciampa EJ, Hunt AA, Arneson KO, Mordes DA, Oldham WM, Woo KV et al. A workshop on leadership for MD/PhD students. Med Educ Online 2011; 16:7075-83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaillard R. Mission sur l'évolution du statut hospitalo-universitaire. Rapport au Ministre de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche. 2011 [On-line] Disponible sur : http://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/cid55974/rapport-mission-sur-l-evolution-du-statut-hospitalo-universitaire.html. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.