Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 12, Numéro 1, février 2011
Page(s) 17 - 27
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2011019
Publié en ligne 19 juillet 2011
  1. AFMC. L’avenir de l’éducation médicale au Canada (AEMC) : Une vision collective pour les études médicales prédoctorales. Ottawa : AFMC ; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Frank JR. Le Cadre de compétences CanMEDS 2005 pour les médecins. L’excellence des normes, des médecins et des soins. 2005 [On-line]. Disponible sur: http://crmcc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_ f.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004;38:314-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ 2001;6:159-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandiera G, Regehr G. Reliability of a structured interview scoring instrument for a Canadian postgraduate emergency medicine training program. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:27-32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. AERA, APA, NCME (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): AERA; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman G. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, & Norman GR. An update on the validity evidence pertaining to the Multiple Mini-Interview as a candidate selection strategy. Canadian Medical Education Conference; 3 au 7 mai 2008; Montréal, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, Wenghofer E, Jacques A, Klass D et al. Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. JAMA 2007;298:993-1001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Med Educ 2009;43:573-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Onyon C, Wall D, Goodyear HM. Reliability of multi-station interviews in selection of junior doctors for specialty training. Med Teach 2009;31:665-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, Crossley J, Lyon P, Kumar K et al. Factors affecting the utility of multiple mini-interviews in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008;42:396-404. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pettersen N, Durivage A. L’entrevue structurée. Pour améliorer la sélection du personnel. Québec : Presses Universitaires du Québec; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. Scullen SE, Mount MK, Goff M. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. J Appl Psychol 2000;85:956-70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harasym PH, Woloschuk W, Mandin H, Brundin-Mather R. Reliability and validity of interviewers’ judgments of medical school candidates. Acad Med 1996;71:S40-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Green CP. Get Talents! Interview for Action, Select for Results. Boston: SkilFast Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lombardo MM, Eichinger RW. For Your Improvement: Guide d’encadrement et de développement destinés aux débutants, superviseurs, dirigeants, conseillers et observateurs. Minneapolis : Lominger Limited; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nisbett RE, DeCamp Wilson T. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1977;35:250-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feeley TH. Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education 2002;51:225-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eva KW, Regehr G. Knowing when to look ip up: a new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med 2007;82:S81-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. van der Vleuten, CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:41-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brownell K, Lockyer J, Lemay J. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007;29:394-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.