EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 12 / Numéro 1 (février 2011) Pédagogie Médicale, 12 1 (2011) 17-27 References
Free Access
Issue
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 12, Number 1, février 2011
Page(s) 17 - 27
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2011019
Published online 19 juillet 2011
  1. AFMC. L’avenir de l’éducation médicale au Canada (AEMC) : Une vision collective pour les études médicales prédoctorales. Ottawa : AFMC ; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Frank JR. Le Cadre de compétences CanMEDS 2005 pour les médecins. L’excellence des normes, des médecins et des soins. 2005 [On-line]. Disponible sur: http://crmcc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_ f.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004;38:314-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ 2001;6:159-75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandiera G, Regehr G. Reliability of a structured interview scoring instrument for a Canadian postgraduate emergency medicine training program. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:27-32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. AERA, APA, NCME (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): AERA; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman G. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, & Norman GR. An update on the validity evidence pertaining to the Multiple Mini-Interview as a candidate selection strategy. Canadian Medical Education Conference; 3 au 7 mai 2008; Montréal, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, Wenghofer E, Jacques A, Klass D et al. Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. JAMA 2007;298:993-1001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Med Educ 2009;43:573-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Onyon C, Wall D, Goodyear HM. Reliability of multi-station interviews in selection of junior doctors for specialty training. Med Teach 2009;31:665-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, Crossley J, Lyon P, Kumar K et al. Factors affecting the utility of multiple mini-interviews in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008;42:396-404. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pettersen N, Durivage A. L’entrevue structurée. Pour améliorer la sélection du personnel. Québec : Presses Universitaires du Québec; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. Scullen SE, Mount MK, Goff M. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. J Appl Psychol 2000;85:956-70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harasym PH, Woloschuk W, Mandin H, Brundin-Mather R. Reliability and validity of interviewers’ judgments of medical school candidates. Acad Med 1996;71:S40-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Green CP. Get Talents! Interview for Action, Select for Results. Boston: SkilFast Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lombardo MM, Eichinger RW. For Your Improvement: Guide d’encadrement et de développement destinés aux débutants, superviseurs, dirigeants, conseillers et observateurs. Minneapolis : Lominger Limited; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nisbett RE, DeCamp Wilson T. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1977;35:250-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feeley TH. Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education 2002;51:225-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eva KW, Regehr G. Knowing when to look ip up: a new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med 2007;82:S81-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. van der Vleuten, CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:41-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brownell K, Lockyer J, Lemay J. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007;29:394-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.