Accès gratuit
Pré-publication électronique
Dans une revue
Pédagogie Médicale
Section Recherche et Perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2025017
Publié en ligne 4 février 2026
  1. Karlsson G, Tham K. Correlating facts or interpreting meaning: Two different epistemological projects within medical research. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13(2):68‐75. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fischer ARH, Tobi H, Ronteltap A. When natural met social: A review of collaboration between the natural and social sciences. Interdiscip Sci Rev 2011;36(4):341‐58. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312(7023):71‐2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice: Step by step: The seven steps of evidence-based practice. AJN Am J Nurs 2010;110(1):51‐3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, Boucher A. CanMEDS 2015 Physician competency framework series I; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheridan DJ. Reversing the decline of academic medicine in Europe. Lancet 2006;367(9523):1698‐701. [Google Scholar]
  7. Salata RA, Geraci MW, Rockey DC, Blanchard M, Brown NJ, Cardinal LJ, et al. U.S. Physician-scientist workforce in the 21st century: Recommendations to attract and sustain the pipeline. Acad Med 2018;93(4). [Google Scholar]
  8. Strong MJ, Busing N, Goosney DL, Harris KA, Horsley T, Kuzyk A, et al. The rising challenge of training physician-scientists: Recommendations from a Canadian national consensus conference. Acad Med 2018;93(2). [Google Scholar]
  9. Borges NJ, Navarro AM, Grover A, Hoban JD. How, when, and why do physicians choose careers in academic medicine? A literature review. Acad Med 2010;85(4). [Google Scholar]
  10. ASSM Académies Suisses des Sciences médicales. Culture scientifique et encouragement de la relève en médecine – Feuille de route; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Chen HC, Ten Cate O, O’Brien B. Evidence-based medicine training in undergraduate medical education: A review and critique of the literature published 2006–2011. Acad Med 2013;88(7):1022‐8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee MGY, Hu WCY, Bilszta JLC. Determining expected research skills of medical students on graduation: A systematic review. Med Sci Educ 2020;30(4):1465‐79. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jouquan J. La formation à la recherche au cours des études médicales : quelques considérations, quelques questions et quelques pistes. Pédagogie Médicale 2018;19(3):109‐12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kyriakoulis K, Patelarou A, Laliotis A, Wan AC, Matalliotakis M, Tsiou C, Patelarou E. Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: Systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2016;13:34. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carberry C, McCombe G, Tobin H, Stokes D, Last J, Bury G, Cullen W. Curriculum initiatives to enhance research skills acquisition by medical students: A scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2021;21(1):312. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stalmeijer RE, Brown MEL, O’Brien BC. How to discuss transferability of qualitative research in health professions education. Clin Teach 2024;21(6):e13762. [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Tackett SA, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach. JHU press; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. Harden RM. What is a spiral curriculum? Med Teach 1999;21(2):141‐3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill education (UK); 2011. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.