EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 26 / Numéro 1 (2025) Pédagogie Médicale, 26 1 (2025) 33-38 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 26, Numéro 1, 2025
Page(s) 33 - 38
Section En direct de la SIFEM
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2025018
Publié en ligne 12 février 2026
  1. Ten Cate O. Health professions education scholarship: The emergence, current status, and future of a discipline in its own right. FASEB Bioadv 2021;3(7):510‐22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vinson AH. Articulating the canon: The sociology of medical education from 1980 to 2000. Health (London) 2023;27(2):169‐85. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen Y-S, Liao K-C, Yau S-Y. From hesitation to participation: A narrative review of facilitators and barriers for healthcare professionals’ engagement in medical education research. BMC Med Educ 2025;25(1):302. [Google Scholar]
  4. Charnell AM, Dennis CA. Enhancing diversity in medical education: Bridging gaps and building inclusive curricula. Med Educ 2025;59(5):460–62. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook DA, Hauer KE, Teherani A, Leep Hunderfund AN, Durning SJ, Colbert-Getz JM. Curriculum research solutions: Shifting from “Did it work locally?” to contributing to a scholarly conversation. Acad Med 2025. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown MEL, Dueñas AN. A medical science educator’s guide to selecting a research paradigm: Building a basis for better research. Med Sci Educ 2020;30(1):545‐53. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boet S, Sharma S, Goldman J, Reeves S. Review article: Medical education research: An overview of methods. Can J Anaesth 2012;59(2):159‐70. [Google Scholar]
  8. Regehr G. It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010;44(1):31‐9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Albert M, Rowland P, Friesen F, Laberge S. Barriers to cross-disciplinary knowledge flow: The case of medical education research. Perspect Med Educ 2022;11(3):149‐55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ball K, Crawford D. How to grow a successful − and happy − research team. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020;17(1):4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ajjawi R, Crampton PES, Rees CE. What really matters for successful research environments? A realist synthesis. Med Educ 2018;52(9):936‐50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010; 44(4):358‐66. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tarlier D. Mediating the meaning of evidence through epistemological diversity. Nurs Inq 2005;12(2):126‐34. [Google Scholar]
  14. Karlsson G, Tham K. Correlating facts or interpreting meaning: Two different epistemological projects within medical research. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13(2):68‐75. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook D, Bordage G, Schmidt H. Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42(2):128‐33. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42(2):128‐33. [Google Scholar]
  17. Regehr G. Trends in medical education research. Acad Med 2004; 79(10):939‐47. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. ’The research compass’: An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56. Med Teach 2011;33(9):695‐709. [Google Scholar]
  19. Albert M, Rowland P, Friesen F, Laberge S. Interdisciplinarity in medical education research: Myth and reality. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2020;25(5):1243‐53. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bourdieu P. Pascalian meditations. Stanford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bourdieu P. Science of science and reflexivity. Polity; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Albert M, Paradis E, Kuper A. Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: The decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars. Soc Sci Med 2015;126:17‐25. [Google Scholar]
  23. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists’ perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008;66(12):2520‐31. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.