Accès gratuit
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 14, Numéro 4, novembre 2013
Page(s) 241 - 253
Section Recherche et perspectives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2013057
Publié en ligne 5 décembre 2013
  1. Bédard D, Béchard, JP. Innover dans l’enseignement supérieur. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.
  2. Vanpee D, Frenay M, Godin V, Bédard D. Ce que la perspective de l’apprentissage et de l’enseignement contextualisés authentiques peut apporter pour optimaliser la qualité pédagogique des stages d’externat. Pédagogie Médicale 2010;10:253-66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  3. Rousseau N. L’apport de l’activité de supervision à la formation pratique. In : Rousseau N. (Dir.), Se former pour mieux superviser. Montréal : Guérin, 2005: 1-11.
  4. Beckers J. Compétences et identité professionnelles. L’enseignement des autres métiers de l’interaction humaine. Bruxelles : De Boeck, 2007.
  5. Benner P. Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bul Sci Tech Soc 2004;24:188-99. [CrossRef]
  6. Field DE. Moving from novice to expert. The value of learning in clinical practice. A literature review. Nurs Educ Today 2004;24:560-5. [CrossRef]
  7. Kilminster SM, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. Effective educational and clinical supervision. Association of Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Education Guide. Med Teach 2007;29:2-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Irby DM, Papadakis M. Does good clinical teaching really make a difference ? Am J Med 2001;110:231-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. St-Pierre L. Se former pour mieux superviser en sciences infirmières. Montréal : Beauchemin Chenelière Éducation, 2004.
  10. Ericsson KA, Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79:S70-S81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  12. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 2009;43:312-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Côté L, Bordage G. Content and conceptual frameworks of preceptor feedback related to residents’educational needs. Acad Med 2012;87:1-8. [CrossRef]
  14. Rohrer D, Pashler H. Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies. Educ Res 2010;39:406-12. [CrossRef]
  15. Chamberland M, Hivon R. Les compétences de l’enseignant clinicien et le modèle de rôle en formation clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 2005;6:98-111. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  16. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Essed GGM, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM. Students’ perceptions of relationships between some educational variables in the out-patient setting. Med Educ 2002;36:735–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Epstein R. Mindful practice. JAMA 1999;282:833-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2009;14:595-621. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schön DA. Le praticien réflexif : À la recherche du savoir caché dans l’agir professionnel. Montréal : Éditions Logiques, 1994.
  21. Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide No. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2008;30:347-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Côté L, Leclère H. How Clinical teachers perceive the doctor-patient relationship and themselves as role models. Acad Med 2000;75:1117-24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tiberius RG, Sinai J, Flak EA. The Role of teacher-learner relationships in medical education. In: Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI (Eds.). International Handbook of research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:463-97.
  24. Wright SM, Kem DE, Kolodner K, Howard DM, Brancati FL. Attributes of excellent attending-physicians role models. N Engl J Med 1998;339:986-1993. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliff (NJ): Prentice Hall, 1977.
  26. Jochemsen-van der Leeuw HGA, van Dijk N, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Wieringa-de Waard M. The attributes of the clinical trainer as a role model: A systematic review. Acad Med 2013;88:26-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Passi V, Johnson S, Peile E, Wright S, Hafferty F, Johnson N. Doctor role modelling in medical education: BEME Guide No. 27. Med Teach 2013;35:e1422–e1436. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kenny NP, Mann KV, MacLeod H. Role modeling in physicians’professional formation: reconsidering an essentiel but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med 2003;78:1203-09. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Role modeling. Making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 2008;336:718-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press 1991;91-117.
  31. Wenger E. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  32. Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
  33. Egan T, Jaye C. Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 2009;13:1107-25.
  34. Handley K, Sturdy A, Fincham R, Clark T. Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. J. Manag. Stud 2006;43:641-53. [CrossRef]
  35. Kilbride C, Perry L, Flatley M, Turner E, Meyer J. Developing theory and practice: Creation of community of practice through action research produced excellence in stroke care. J Interprof Care 2011;25:91-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tremblay DG. Les communautés de pratique : quels sont les facteurs de succès ? Revue internationale sur le travail et la société 2005;3(2):692-722.
  37. Hugues I. Action research in healthcare. In: Reason P, Hilary B. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage Publ., 2008.
  38. Dolbec A. La recherche-action. (2002). In : Gauthier B. (Ed.). Recherche sociale : de la problématique à la collecte des données. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2002:467-496.
  39. Meyer J. Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ 2006;320:178-81. [CrossRef]
  40. L’Ecuyer R. L’analyse de contenu : notions et étapes. In : Deslauriers JP. Les méthodes de la recherche qualitative. Sillery : Presses de l’Université du Québec, 1988:49-65.
  41. Côté L, Turgeon J. Comment lire de façon critique les articles de recherche qualitative en médecine. Pédagogie Médicale 2002;3:81-90. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.