Accès gratuit
Editorial
Numéro
Pédagogie Médicale
Volume 14, Numéro 1, février 2013
Page(s) 5 - 7
Section Éditorial
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2013033
Publié en ligne 9 avril 2013
  1. Pelaccia T, Dory V, Denef J-F. La recherche en éducation médicale : état des lieux, perspectives et rôle de la Société internationale francophone d'éducation médicale (SIFEM). Pédagogie Médicale 2011; 12:139-48. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  2. Denef J-F, Maillard D. Le Congrès AMEE–SIFEM d’août 2012 à Lyon, un moment important dans la vie de notre société. Pédagogie Médicale 2012; 13:221-223. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  3. Trigwell K, Shale S. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud High Educ 2004;29:523-36. [CrossRef]
  4. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. Br Med J 2007;335:333-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eva KW. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ 2009; 43:294-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Norman G. How Bad Is Medical Education Research Anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ 2007;12:1-5. [CrossRef]
  7. Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. La recherche en éducation médicale : entre le service et la science. Pédagogie Médicale 2006;7:73-81. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  8. Pelaccia T, Paillé P. La recherche qualitative en pédagogie médicale : histoire, pratique et légitimité. Pédagogie Médicale 2011;12:179-92. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  9. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:2520-2531. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gruppen L. Is medical education research “hard” or “soft” research? Adv Health Sci Educ 2008;13:1-2. [CrossRef]
  11. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:128-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 2003;37:582-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010;44:31-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 2009;43:196-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpier A. « La boussole de la recherche » : un introduction à la recherche en éducation médicale. Guide AMEE n°56. Pédagogie Médicale 2013;14:49-72. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  16. Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Method Res 2007;1:48-76. [CrossRef]
  17. Jouquan J. La publication des versions françaises d’une sélection de guides de l’Association for medical education in Europe: un nouveau partenariat entre la SIFEM et l’AMEE. Pédagogie Médicale 2012;13:77-8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.